Palmer v. State, S90A0328

Decision Date12 July 1990
Docket NumberNo. S90A0328,S90A0328
Citation393 S.E.2d 251,260 Ga. 330
PartiesPALMER v. The STATE.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Marcus R. Morris, Kinney, Kemp, Pickell, Sponcler & Joiner and Cynthia N Johnson, Kinney, Kemp, Pickell, Sponcler & Joiner, Dalton, for Palmer.

Jack O. Partain III, Dist. Atty., Conasauga Judicial Circuit, Dalton, for the State.

SMITH, Presiding Justice.

The appellant, Robbie E. Palmer, was convicted of sexual assault against persons in custody under OCGA § 16-6-5.1. We reverse. 1

The appellant was a juvenile probation officer in Whitfield County who was assigned to monitor a fourteen year old female probationer. Although Mr. Palmer had consensual sexual relations with the probationer on two occasions, he was only charged for an incident that occurred in January 1989.

The appellant contends that his conviction under OCGA § 16-6-5.1(b) should be reversed because the term "in the custody of the law," as applied in the statute, does not encompass persons placed on probation.

OCGA § 16-6-5.1(b) provides:

A person commits sexual assault when he engages in sexual contact with another person who is in the custody of the law or who is detained in or is a patient in a hospital or other institution and such actor has supervisory or disciplinary authority over such other person. ... 2

In interpreting statutes we are required to apply the ordinary signification "to all words, except words of art or words connected with a particular trade or subject matter. ..." OCGA § 1-3-1(b). We note first that the title of the section as a whole is "Sexual assault against persons in custody." (Emphasis supplied). Looking at other criminal statutes, we find only one that uses "custody" in a similar context. That statute, OCGA § 16-10-52, prescribes penalties for escape, and presupposes actual imprisonment or detention. See Chandler v. State, 257 Ga. 775, 364 S.E.2d 273 (1988). Furthermore, the Probation Order which relegated the probationer to the court's supervision makes a distinction between "custody" and probation. The order states, "The probationer may be taken into custody and detained for violation of any condition of probation herein granted." The American Heritage Dictionary defines custody as, "2. the state of being kept or guarded; and 3. the state of being detained or held under guard, especially by the police." It is undisputed that the probationer was free to go about her normal activities subject to a court imposed curfew and her refraining from any illegal acts. It does not appear, applying the ordinary signification to the terms, that a person on probation is a person "in custody" or "in the custody of the law."

Criminal statutes must be construed strictly against the State...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • State v. Miller
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • December 5, 1990
    ...rule that criminal statutes must be strictly construed against the state and liberally in favor of the accused. Palmer v. State, 260 Ga. 330, 331, 393 S.E.2d 251 (1990); Knight v. State, 243 Ga. 770, 775(2), 257 S.E.2d 182 (1979); Balkcom v. Defore, 219 Ga. 641, 642(2), 135 S.E.2d 425 (1964......
  • Whitehead v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • January 15, 2009
    ...Ga. App. 822, 824, 535 S.E.2d 246 (2000). 5. Supra. 6. Id. at 829, 590 S.E.2d 136. 7. Id. at 831(2), 590 S.E.2d 136. 8. Id. 9. 260 Ga. 330, 393 S.E.2d 251 (1990). 10. Id. 11. Id. at 331, 393 S.E.2d 251. 12. Ga. L.1990, p. 1003, § 1. See Randolph, supra at 147(1), 496 S.E.2d 258. In 1991, th......
  • Pierson v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • February 25, 2019
    ...U.S. at 319 (III) (B), 99 S.Ct. 2781.19 Bautista v. State , 305 Ga. App. 210, 211 (1), 699 S.E.2d 392 (2010).20 See Palmer v. State , 260 Ga. 330, 331, 393 S.E.2d 251 (1990) (The Supreme Court ruled that the term "custody," as used in OCGA § 16-6-5.1, was similar in context to how the term ......
  • State v. English, No. S02A1808
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • March 24, 2003
    ...Id. Finally, "[c]riminal statutes must be construed strictly against the State and in favor of the accused. [Cit.]" Palmer v. State, 260 Ga. 330, 331, 393 S.E.2d 251 (1990). This Court has confirmed that OCGA § 17-7-50 applies to unindicted pre-trial detainees being held without bail, regar......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT