Pappalardo v. Long Is. R.R.
Decision Date | 09 February 2006 |
Docket Number | 744/01. |
Parties | RENATA PAPPALARDO, as Executrix of ANTONINO PAPPALARDO, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. LONG ISLAND RAILROAD COMPANY et al., Defendants. |
Court | New York Supreme Court |
Landman Corsi Ballantine & Ford PC., Newark, New Jersey, for defendants.
Paul Garner, Brewster, for plaintiff.
Prior to working for defendant LIRR as a car repairman and welder, decedent performed related work for the Erie-Lackawana Railroad or its predecessors from April 1951 to November 1967 (motion, exhibit F, plaintiff's bill of particulars). Decedent, in his examination before trial (motion, exhibit N, at 59-60), admitted to smoking about one pack of cigarettes a day for 15 years. Decedent was diagnosed with hepatitis C and cirrhosis of the liver in 1994, and was diagnosed with liver cancer in 1997. Mr. Pappalardo died on March 8, 2002 (motion, exhibit J, death certificate).
Defendants move to dismiss the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) as an improper defendant upon the grounds that the MTA is shielded from a FELA action pursuant to Public Authorities Law § 1266 (5) and for summary judgment and dismissal of the action on the grounds that there is no competent evidence that defendant LIRR failed to provide decedent with a reasonably safe work environment. Plaintiff, as executrix of decedent's estate, cross-moves for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability, claiming that defendants' failure to provide a safe work environment contributed to Mr. Pappalardo's death.
For the reasons to follow, that branch of defendants' motion to dismiss the MTA from the action, pursuant to Public Authorities Law § 1266 (5), is denied (counsel for LIRR and MTA continually refers to this subdivision of the Public Authorities Law as section 1266 [c], a subdivision which does not exist; the court will assume from the arguments of defendants' counsel that counsel means section 1266 [5], and admonishes defendants' counsel to prepare their motion papers correctly and proofread their papers before submission to this or any other court). For historical reasons, FELA applies to the LIRR, a railroad held to be in interstate commerce. FELA, as will be explained below, supercedes the MTA's use of Public Authorities Law § 1266 (5) as a shield from lawsuits by injured Metro-North Railroad and LIRR employees. Therefore, defendant MTA, the owner and operator of defendant LIRR since 1966, will not be dismissed from the instant action.
That branch of defendants' motion for summary judgment and dismissal of the instant action, as well as plaintiff's cross motion for partial summary judgment, is denied because triable issues of fact exist.
When still alive, decedent commenced the instant action for violation of FELA. Subsequently, decedent's executrix amended the complaint to continue the case as a FELA wrongful death action. Plaintiff alleges that: decedent contracted occupational diseases and conditions as a result of his exposure to hazardous substances while an employee of the LIRR; the LIRR did not provide decedent with proper protective equipment warnings, and information as protection against these exposures; and defendants' failure to consider and provide for the safety of its decedent employee was a violation of the statutory duties imposed by FELA. FELA provides at 45 USC § 51 that:
"Every common carrier by railroad while engaging in commerce between any of the several States or Territories, or between any of the States and Territories, or between the District of Columbia and any of the States or Territories, or between the District of Columbia or any of the States or Territories and any foreign nation or nations, shall be liable in damages to any person suffering injury while he is employed by such carrier in such commerce, or, in case of the death of such employee, to his or her personal representative . . . for such injury or death resulting in whole or in part from the negligence of any of the officers, agents, or employees of such carrier, or by reason of any defect or insufficiency, due to its negligence, in its cars, engines, appliances, machinery, track, roadbed, works, boats, wharves, or other equipment."
FELA was enacted in 1908, during the Progressive Era, to address the large number of work-related injuries in the railroad industry. In Kernan v. American Dredging Co. (355 US 426, 431-432 [1958]), the Court stated that:
(See Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Buell, 480 US 557 [1987]; Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 352 US 500 [1957]; Urie v. Thompson, 337 US 163 [1948].)
Justice William O. Douglas, in analyzing FELA, observed in his concurring opinion in Wilkerson v. McCarthy (336 US 53, 68 [1949]) that:
Defendants rely upon Noonan v. Long Is. R.R. (158 AD2d 392 [1st Dept 1990]) to argue that defendant LIRR, a public benefit corporation and corporate subsidiary of defendant MTA, is shielded from the instant action by Public Authorities Law § 1266 (5). Public Authorities Law § 1266 (5) specifies that the MTA's subsidiary corporations are distinct entities. Each is subject to suit and each is responsible for maintenance and repair of their own facilities, not the MTA. Further, Public Authorities Law § 1266 (5) states that "[t]he employees of any such subsidiary corporation, except those who are also employees of the [MTA], shall not be deemed employees of the [MTA]." In Noonan, plaintiff sued both the MTA and the LIRR for personal injury suffered by tripping over a raised railroad spike when crossing LIRR tracks. Noonan was clearly not a FELA action and the Court held (at 393) that "in this action which alleges negligence in the improper operation, maintenance and control of the railroad facilities owned by the LIRR, the MTA is not a proper party."
Greene v. Long Is. R.R. Co. (99 F Supp 2d 268 [US Dist Ct, ED NY 2000], affd 280 F3d 224 [2d Cir 2002], cert denied sub nom. Metropolitan Transp. Authority v. Greene, 538 US 1031 [200...
To continue reading
Request your trial- Pappalardo v. Long Island Rail Road Company
-
Aguirre v. Long Island Railroad Co., 2007 NY Slip Op 32147(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 6/29/2007)
... ... and statutory, relating to the liability of railroads for injury to employees in interstate commerce, and the FELA remedy is exclusive" (Pappalardo v Long Island Railroad Co., 11 Misc 3d 744, 748 [2006]). Although federal law applies, in all instances, with respect to the substantive law issues ... ...
-
Aguirre v. Long Is. Rail Rd. Co., 2007 NY Slip Op 51384(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 7/16/2007)
... ... and statutory, relating to the liability of railroads for injury to employees in interstate commerce, and the FELA remedy is exclusive"(Pappalardo v. Long Island Railroad Co., 11 Misc 3d 744, 748 [2006]). Although federal law applies, in all instances, with respect to the substantive law issues ... ...