Parham v. National Relief Assur. Co.
Decision Date | 13 November 1924 |
Docket Number | 15781. |
Citation | 125 S.E. 519,33 Ga.App. 59 |
Parties | PARHAM v. NATIONAL RELIEF ASSUR. CO. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Syllabus by the Court.
Under the facts of the case, the plaintiff was entitled to recover and the direction of the verdict in favor of the defendant was error.
Additional Syllabus by Editorial Staff.
Where there is conflict between provisions of policy, those most favorable to insured control.
Error from Superior Court, Bibb County; H. A. Mathews, Judge.
Action by J. H. Parham against the National Relief Assurance Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error. Reversed.
Ryals & Anderson, of Macon, for plaintiff in error.
R. D Feagin, of Macon, for defendant in error.
This is a suit upon an accident policy. The policy was dated March 28, 1921, and recited that the insured was insured from 12 o'clock noon on that day until 12 o'clock noon of May 1, 1921, and for such further periods stated in the renewal receipts as the renewal premium of $3.72 per month paid by the insured would maintain the policy in force. The policy further provided as follows:
It was expressly stated, however, in the application for the policy, which was signed by the insured and attached to the policy and, by the express terms of the policy, made a part of the insurance contract, that the insurance was not to take effect until the delivery of the policy to the insured.
The undisputed...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Parham v. Nat'l Relief Assur. Co
...33 Ga.App. 59125 S.E. 519PARHAM.v.NATIONAL RELIEF ASSUR. CO.(No. 15781.)Court of Appeals of Georgia, Division No. 1.Nov. 13, 1924.(Syllabus by the Court.)Error from Superior Court, Bibb County; H. A. Mathews, Judge.Action by J. H. Parham against the National Relief Assurance Company. Judg-[125 S.E. 520]ment for defendant, and plaintiff ... ...