Parker v. D'Acres

Decision Date14 July 1885
Citation7 P. 862,2 Wash.Terr. 362
CourtWashington Supreme Court
PartiesPARKER v. D'ACRES.

Error to First district. Motion to dismiss appeal.

A. E. Isham, for plaintiff in error.

B. L. & J. L. Sharpstein, for defendant in error.

GREENE, C.J.

This cause has been brought here under the provisions of the appeal act of 1883, which allow all cases, of whatever jurisdiction, to be taken to this court by the simple service of a notice of appeal given and entered in the lower court. The uniformity of mode of procedure prescribed by that act does not do away with the essential distinctions between causes at law and causes in equity for purposes of review. Rule 5 of this court, in view of these distinctions, and to facilitate the business of the court, and to harmonize the appellate practice under the act of 1883 with that under the Code, has provided, in substance, that in all law causes brought up under the act of 1883 an assignment of errors shall be made in writing, and filed with the clerk of the proper district court, to be certified to this court as a part of the record, and that a copy of such assignment shall be served on the adverse party within 20 days after the entry in the journal of the district court of the notice of appeal. Plaintiff in error did not serve a copy of assignment of errors in this cause within the time limited, and on that ground defendant in error moves to dismiss the appeal. No good reason for denying the motion appears. Doubtless rule 5, ever since its adoption, has been part of the law applicable to suitors in this court, without regard to when it first was published in print.

Let the motion to dismiss the appeal be granted.

HOYT and TURNER, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Hanson v. C. B. & Q. R. R. Company
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • April 2, 1923
    ... ... J ... 1347; William Bros. Co. v. Kelly, 122 N.W. 646; ... Hanselman v. Adrion, 139 Mich. 546; Lyon v ... Mauss, 31 Utah 283; Parker v. Dakers, 2 Wash.Terr. 362, ... 7 P. 862.) ... Metz, ... Sackett & Metz and Devaney & Edwards and W. W. Patterson, ... A ... ...
  • Parker v. Denny
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • July 23, 1885

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT