Parker v. Johnson
| Decision Date | 14 September 1960 |
| Citation | 206 N.Y.S.2d 594,26 Misc.2d 31 |
| Parties | Ruby PARKER, Landlord, v. 'Mary' JOHNSON, first name fictitious, true first name being unknown to landlord, Tenant. |
| Court | New York City Municipal Court |
Samuel Pecker, New York City, for landlord.
'Mary' Johnson, in pro. per.
The tenant herein claims that a refrigerator belonging to the landlord was defective and that she caused it to be removed to the basement of the building and installed her own refrigerator in its place, without the specific consent of the landlord. There is no written lease specifically defining the rights and obligations of the parties with respect to the maintenance of the refrigerator. The landlord contends that the act of the tenant constitutes an act of waste, and consequently a violation of a substantial obligation of the tenancy under Section 52, Subdivision 1 of the Rent Regulations, McK.Unconsol.Laws, Appendix, and brings this holdover proceeding accordingly.
The rule has been laid down in cases where the tenant makes a physical change or alteration without the landlord's consent, and the landlord claims that the tenant has thereby violated the specific covenant in the lease with respect thereto, in Andrews v. Day Button Co., 1892, 132 N.Y. 348, at page 353, 30 N.E. 831, at page 832, as follows:
'The covenant of the lessee that he would not make any alteration in the premises without the consent of the landlord was only an undertaking imposed by law, which is to the effect that any material and substantial change or alteration of the nature of the property is waste (Agate v. Lowenbein, 57 N.Y. 604.) * * * the tenant has no right 'to make improvements or alterations which will materially and permanently change the nature of the property, so as to render it impossible for him to restore the same premises substantially at the expiration of the term''.
In Lansis v. Meklinsky, 10 A.D.2d 649, 198 N.Y.S.2d 247 the Appellate Division 2nd Dept. recently held that the action of the tenant in removing a sink and stove from his apartment and placing them intact in the basement of the leased premises and in then having the tenant's own sink and stove installed in his apartment did not constitute an alteration within the meaning of the lease. It is true that in that case there was evidence at the trial that the landlord had orally consented to the substitution of the sink and stove. However, the opinion...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Madison 52nd Corp. v. Ogust
...207; Stern v. Carroll, 28 Misc.2d 507, 219 N.Y.S.2d 820; Taylor, Inc. v. Teller, 28 Misc.2d 508, 208 N.Y.S.2d 142; Parker v. Johnson, 26 Misc.2d 31, 206 N.Y.S.2d 594; Parkside Development Co. v. McGee, 21 Misc.2d 277, 193 N.Y.S.2d 910; Zalaznick v. Imbembo, 35 Misc.2d 164, 232 N.Y.S.2d 442;......
-
In re Allen Carpet Shops, Inc.
...owned by tenant); Lansis v. Meklinsky, 10 A.D.2d 649, 198 N.Y.S.2d 247 (2d Dept.1960) (replacement of sink and stove); Parker v. Johnson, 26 Misc.2d 31, 206 N.Y.S.2d 594 (Mun.Ct., Bronx County 1960) (replacement of refrigerator); Sigsbee Holding Corp. v. Canavan, supra (replacement of cabin......
-
A & B Cabrini Realty Co. v. Newman
...violation of a substantial obligation of the tenancy within the meaning of Section 52, subd. 1 of the Rent Regulations, Parker v. Johnson, 26 Misc.2d 31, 206 N.Y.S.2d 594; nor was the installation of three air conditioners, weighing 750 pounds each, by a lessee of a restaurant without Landl......
-
Sigsbee Holding Corp. v. Canavan
... ... Meklinsky, 10 A.D.2d 649(7), 198 N.Y.S.2d 247), or the landlord's refrigerator (Parker v. Johnson, 26 Misc.2d 31, 206 N.Y.S.2d 594) and replaces them with his own without the landlord's consent, he does not violate the covenant of the ... ...