Parker v. State, 52655
| Decision Date | 08 December 1976 |
| Docket Number | No. 52655,52655 |
| Citation | 544 S.W.2d 149 |
| Parties | Robert Eugene PARKER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. |
| Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
DALLY, Commissioner.
This is an appeal from a conviction for the offense of possession of cocaine; the punishment, which was enhanced by a prior felony conviction, is imprisonment for 50 years.
The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged; the appellant's sole ground of error is that his motion to suppress evidence was erroneously overruled and the cocaine that was introduced in evidence was unlawfully obtained. The appellant in his brief admits that a search of the appellant for weapons was reasonable at its inception, but specifically complains that 'the intensity and scope of the search went beyond legal limits when the officers took the defendant's billfold and searched it is violation of the defendant's Fourth Amendment rights.'
B. R. Armond, a Fort Worth police officer serving with the Narcotic Intelligence Division, had information from an anonymous source, which corroborated some other information he had, concerning the unlawful possession of drugs at an apartment in a multi-unit complex. Officers then kept the apartment under surveillance for several hours on two or three days in an effort to obtain additional information with which they could make an affidavit to have a search warrant issued. The appellant was seen to enter, stay for a short time, and leave the apartment on several occasions. While on surveillance two police officers saw the appellant and another man come from the apartment, and as the men walked to an automobile parked at the curb they were approached by the officers.
The officers intended to talk with the men in an attempt to get additional information which might be used to obtain the search warrant. After the officers, who were in plain clothes, told the men they were police officers and exhibited their badges, they heard a 'rustling motion' from the direction of the appellant. He turned away from the officers and placed his hand under a bulky shirt which he was wearing with the tail out. One of the officers unholstered his pistol. Pointed it at appellant, asked the appellant twice to take his hand away from his belt, and when he did not...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Sanchez v. State
...cause to arrest him. Jones v. State, 565 S.W.2d 934 (Tex.Cr.App.1978); Myre v. State, 545 S.W.2d 820 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); Parker v. State, 544 S.W.2d 149 (Tex.Cr.App.1976). The physical items were found on the open lid of the glove compartment and in plain view of the officers as they were st......
-
Jones v. State
...dollars, was incident to his lawful arrest and therefore reasonable. Myre v. State, 545 S.W.2d 820 (Tex.Cr.App.1977); Parker v. State, 544 S.W.2d 149 (Tex.Cr.App.1976); Reed v. State, 522 S.W.2d 916 (Tex.Cr.App.1975). The pistol on the breakfast bar was contraband in plain view which may be......
-
Amorella v. State
...error in the admission in evidence of the contraband is reflected. Merriweather v. State, 501 S.W.2d 887 (Tex.Cr.App.); Parker v. State, 544 S.W.2d 149 (Tex.Cr.App.). The judgment is Opinion approved by the Court. DOUGLAS, Judge, concurring. I concur in the opinion for the reasons given by ......
-
Duncan v. State
...685 (1969). See Simpson v. State, 486 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Merriweather v. State, 501 S.W.2d 887 (Tex.Cr.App.1973) and Parker v. State, 544 S.W.2d 149 (Tex.Cr.App., decided December 8, Purcell gave no testimony which indicated that he was in fear of his life or that he thought appe......