Parker v. Travelers Ins. Co.
Citation | 142 Ga.App. 711,236 S.E.2d 915 |
Decision Date | 01 July 1977 |
Docket Number | No. 2,No. 53976,53976,2 |
Parties | Mrs. R. F. PARKER et al. v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY et al |
Court | United States Court of Appeals (Georgia) |
Swift, Currie, McGhee & Hiers, Charles L. Drew, John A. Ferguson, Atlanta, for appellants.
Jack F. Peace, Atlanta, for appellees.
This is an appeal from an award denying appellant's claim for workmen's compensation death benefits. The facts are not in dispute: the sole issue is whether the injury complained of arose out of and in the course of employment.
Appellant's deceased husband was employed as a truck driver, dockman, and part-time mechanic by appellee. At the time of his death, decedent was in charge of business operations on his employer's premises. Irrespective of whether or not there was work to do, decedent was required and paid to remain on the premises to render services to customers when necessary. When no other activities demanded his immediate services, i. e., during enforced lull or slack periods, decedent was permitted to work on employees' personal cars. Decedent had worked on co-employees' and his personal car during slack periods on prior workdays. His employer did not prohibit, and in fact condoned, this practice. While working on his personal car during a slack period, decedent was killed when a jack slipped and the vehicle fell on him.
We reverse the judgment of the Superior Court affirming the award of the State Board of Workmen's Compensation.
1. Holcombe v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., 102 Ga.App. 587, 588, 116 S.E.2d 891, 893; Atkinson v. Home Indemnity Co., 141 Ga.App. 687, 234 S.E.2d 359. However, where, as here, Travelers Ins. Co. v. Smith, 91 Ga.App. 305, 308, 85 S.E.2d 484, 486.
2. In rendering our decision we are mindful that Simmons Co. v. Thaxton, 121 Ga.App. 295(1), 173 S.E.2d 429.
3. The State Board of Workmen's Compensation's finding of fact discloses that at the time of the accident the employee was where he was authorized to be, at a time he was authorized to be there, and was engaged in an activity permitted by his employer. Although decedent was killed while repairing his personal car, the injury-causing activity benefited the employer insofar as it provided a means for the employee to while away his slack time, thus tending to keep him alert and more satisfied. We hold that under the circumstances here, where (1) the employer knew that claimant used slack time to work on personal projects, (2) the employer condoned or permitted such activity, (3) that the employee was required to remain on the premises during slack periods, and (4) that the injury occurred during a slack or enforced lull period while engaged in an authorized activity, in an authorized place and during an authorized time, that the injury arose out of and in the course of employment. See Hanchett v. Brezner Tanning Co., 107 N.H. 236, 221 A.2d 246; Chrisman v. Farmers Cooperative Assn. of Bradshaw, 179 Neb. 891, 140 N.W.2d 809; Penzara v. Maffia Bros., 307 N.Y. 15, 119 N.E.2d 570. See also W. R. Grace & Co. v. Payne, 501 S.W.2d 252 (Ky.App.1973); Lee v. F. M. Henderson & Associates, 17 N.C.App. 475, 195 S.E.2d 48. See generally 1 Larson, Workmen's Compensation Law 5-241 § 27.31(b). Cf., Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Souther, 110 Ga.App. 84, 137 S.E.2d 705 ( ). Glen Falls Ins. Co. v. Merck, 117 Ga.App. 163, 159 S.E.2d 300 (...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cartersville City Sch. v. Johnson
...are undisputed, whether the injury arose out of and in the course of employment is a question of law." Parker v. Travelers Ins. Co. , 142 Ga. App. 711, 712 (1), 236 S.E.2d 915 (1977) (citation and punctuation omitted). Accord Thornton v. Hartford Acc. etc. Co. , 198 Ga. 786, 795, 32 S.E.2d ......
-
Orsini v. Industrial Com'n of Illinois
...hours where the employer had knowledge of or acquiesced in the practice of their employees. See, e.g., Parker v. Travelers Insurance Company (1977), 142 Ga.App. 711, 236 S.E.2d 915; Penzara v. Maffia Brothers (1954), 307 N.Y. 15, 119 N.E.2d 570; W.R. Grace and Company v. Payne (Ky.App.1973)......
-
Graves v. Builders Steel Supply, 75690
...of this type particularly seem to result in splintered opinions, decided upon a case-by-case basis. In Parker v. Travelers Ins. Co., 142 Ga.App. 711, 712, 236 S.E.2d 915 (1977), it was held that a truck driver, dockman, and part-time mechanic, who was injured while working during slack peri......
-
Orsini v. Industrial Com'n
...of our sister States which have held contrary to our position in Mazursky and Fisher Body. (See, e.g., Parker v. Travelers Insurance Co. (1977), 142 Ga.App. 711, 236 S.E.2d 915.) We are not bound by these decisions (Gorham v. Board of Trustees of the Teachers' Retirement System (1963), 27 I......