Parks v. Johnson

Citation46 Mass.App.Ct. 905,703 N.E.2d 728
Decision Date28 December 1998
Docket NumberNo. 97-P-1953,97-P-1953
PartiesDan PARKS v. Barbara JOHNSON.
CourtAppeals Court of Massachusetts

Barbara C. Johnson, pro se.

Daniel J. Parks, pro se.

RESCRIPT.

1. Jury instructions. For purposes of this appeal, we have assumed, as the defendant does in her appeal, that Mass.R.Civ.P. 51(b), 365 Mass. 816 (1974), was applicable in the small claims jury-of-six trial below. See G.L. c. 218, § 23, par. 4; Rule 10(b) of the Uniform Small Claims Rules, as amended (1987). As the record stands, there was no objection to the jury instructions, and we decline to reach the merits of the defendant's arguments concerning the allegedly deficient jury instructions. See Callahan v. A.J. Welch Equip. Corp., 36 Mass.App.Ct. 608, 612, 634 N.E.2d 134 (1994); Read v. Mt. Tom Ski Area, Inc., 37 Mass.App.Ct. 901, 901 n. 1, 639 N.E.2d 391 (1994). A sidebar colloquy following the charge was characterized as inaudible in the record. The defendant, who is the appellant, did not attempt to file a statement of the proceedings or to correct or supplement the record to reflect the substance of the colloquy. See Mass.R.A.P. 8(c)-(e), as amended, 378 Mass. 933 (1979). Thus, to the extent that the appellant claims that she objected to the jury instructions and requested curative instructions during that sidebar conference, such assertions are unavailing because they are not supported by the record. See Swerling-Ginsberg-Lynn Adjusters, Inc. v. D & E Realty Co., 15 Mass.App.Ct. 908, 443 N.E.2d 419 (1982). It was the appellant's burden to provide us with an adequate record demonstrating that the issues had been preserved. Burda v. Spencer, 28 Mass.App.Ct. 685, 688, 554 N.E.2d 1227 (1990).

2. Sufficiency of the evidence. Contrary to the defendant's assertions, the evidence, read in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, supported the finding that the defendant agreed to, or authorized, the many changes to the original contract. See Shear v. Gabovitch, 43 Mass.App.Ct. 650, 671, 685 N.E.2d 1168 (1997). By her words and conduct the defendant impliedly waived the provision of the contract requiring all changes to be in writing. See Worcester Air Conditioning Co., Inc. v. Commercial Union Ins. Co., 14 Mass.App.Ct. 352, 357, 439 N.E.2d 845 (1982). The defendant, although a lawyer, seems to overlook that an appellate court does not retry the facts.

3. G.L. c. 93A, § 9, counterclaim. There was ample basis in the record for the judge's finding that there had been no G.L. c. 93A violation. See Asian Am. Civic Assn. v. Chinese Consol. Benevolent Assn. of New England, Inc., 43...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Commonwealth v. Denehy
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • January 8, 2014
    ...on the record her desire to continue to pursue the motion or to seek correction of the docket entry. Cf. Parks v. Johnson, 46 Mass.App.Ct. 905, 905, 703 N.E.2d 728 (1998) (court declined to consider issue of jury instructions where record did not reflect that appellant had objected and appe......
  • Others1 v. Catania Hospitality Group Inc.
    • United States
    • Appeals Court of Massachusetts
    • February 25, 2011
    ...in the affidavits. See Patsos v. First Albany Corp., 433 Mass. 323, 324 n. 2, 741 N.E.2d 841 (2001); Parks v. Johnson, 46 Mass.App.Ct. 905, 905–906, 703 N.E.2d 728 (1998); McCrea v. Flaherty, 71 Mass.App.Ct. 637, 644 n. 9, 885 N.E.2d 836 (2008), citing Madsen v. Erwin, 395 Mass. 715, 721, 4......
  • Bachorz v. Miller–Forslund
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit
    • December 26, 2012
    ...oral modification). Parties may waive orally provisions requiring modifications to be in writing. See, e.g., Parks v. Johnson, 46 Mass.App.Ct. 905, 703 N.E.2d 728, 728–29 (1998) (holding that a party to a construction contract impliedly waived, through words and conduct, a provision requiri......
  • Gallo v. Marinelli, 15–P–1592.
    • United States
    • Appeals Court of Massachusetts
    • September 30, 2016
    ...tenant's right to quiet enjoyment of the apartment. We review the evidence in the light most favorable to the tenant. Parks v. Johnson, 46 Mass.App.Ct. 905, 906 (1998). “The covenant of quiet enjoyment pertains to ‘acts or omissions that impair the character and value of the [leased premise......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT