Parks v. State
| Decision Date | 01 May 2000 |
| Docket Number | No. S00A0342.,S00A0342. |
| Citation | 529 S.E.2d 127,272 Ga. 353 |
| Parties | PARKS v. The STATE. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Virginia W. Tinkler, Decatur, for appellant.
J. Tom Morgan III, District Attorney, Barbara B. Conroy, Assistant District Attorney, Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Paula K. Smith, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Adam M. Hames, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
A jury found Leonard Parks, Jr. guilty of felony murder, aggravated assault, and burglary, in connection with the death of Anthony Bailey. Parks challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, and we affirm. 1
Parks drove co-indictees Kevin Taylor and Ronnie Purvis to Bailey's residence. They had previously discussed robbing Bailey, in retribution for an incident in which Bailey had taken the stereo from Parks's vehicle. Taylor and Purvis forcibly entered Bailey's residence; Parks did not enter for fear that he would be recognized. Taylor held a gun to Ross's head while Purvis sought out and fatally shot Bailey. Both Purvis and Taylor fled the residence without taking any property and met with Parks, who drove the two men away from the crime scene. Parks drove Purvis to a friend's home to hide the guns used in the attack. The following day, after hearing Bailey was dead, Parks drove Purvis back to the friend's home to retrieve the guns. Taylor asked Parks when Parks intended on paying him. Shortly thereafter, Parks gave Taylor approximately $100 worth of crack cocaine, and gave Purvis $100 worth of cocaine in exchange for $50.
Parks contends that there is no evidence that he participated in any plan to commit the crimes. Under OCGA § 16-2-20, one is a party to a crime if he intentionally aids or abets the commission of the crime, or advises, encourages, hires, counsels, or procures another to commit it. Whether a person is a party to a crime may be inferred from the person's presence, companionship, and conduct before and after the crime was committed. Walsh v. State, 269 Ga. 427, 429(1), 499 S.E.2d 332 (1998). Parks's statement to police showed that, prior to the crimes, he discussed with Purvis and Taylor going to Bailey's home and obtaining revenge. Knowing that the two were armed, he drove them to Bailey's residence while they discussed what they would say after kicking in the door, and where Parks should leave them and pick them up. After the crimes, Parks stated that he gave Taylor cocaine "for what he did." Beyond this direct evidence that Parks hired Taylor to commit the crimes and aided in their commission, a witness who had declined to join the plot against Bailey testified to its existence, and Parks's involvement in it.
Parks also contends that he did not intend the outcome of the criminal plan. But criminal intent may be inferred from conduct before, during and after the commission of the crime. Williams v. State, 262 Ga. 677(1), 424 S.E.2d 624 (1993). Here there was evidence from which the jury could infer that Parks intended that Taylor and Purvis force entry into Bailey's...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Fitts v. State
...as a party to a crime because the crimes he did intend were dangerous and created a foreseeable risk of death); Parks v. State , 272 Ga. 353, 354, 529 S.E.2d 127 (2000) (same). Accordingly, Franklin's argument fails.4. Franklin also argues that as a matter of federal constitutional due proc......
-
Fleming v. State, S19A0116
...omitted.) Hayes v. State , 292 Ga. 506, 506, 739 S.E.2d 313 (2013). See also OCGA § 16-2-21 (party to a crime); Parks v. State , 272 Ga. 353, 354-355, 529 S.E.2d 127 (2000). 2. Next, Fleming argues that the trial court erred by failing to sua sponte rebuke the prosecutor under OCGA § 17-8-7......
-
Ellis v. State, S12A1923.
...properly might have found that Ellis was not merely present at the scene of the crimes, but was a party to them. See Parks v. State, 272 Ga. 353, 354, 529 S.E.2d 127 (2000). Cf. Moore v. State, 255 Ga. 519, 521(1), 340 S.E.2d 888 (1986) (evidence was insufficient where it was only circumsta......
-
Foster v. State
...therein.2 However, intent "may be inferred from conduct before, during and after the commission of the crime." Parks v. State, 272 Ga. 353, 354, 529 S.E.2d 127 (2000). Foster committed physical violence both outside and inside the house, entered it armed with a tire lug wrench he had taken ......