Parmenter v. Nash, 898
Decision Date | 09 November 2018 |
Docket Number | 898,CAF 18–00514 |
Parties | In the Matter of Tymothy M. PARMENTER, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Julie E. NASH, Respondent–Respondent. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF MID–NEW YORK, INC., SYRACUSE (JOSEPH V. MASLAK OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER–APPELLANT.
ROBERT P. COLEMAN, III, WASHINGTON, D.C., FOR RESPONDENT–RESPONDENT.
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, NEMOYER, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the objection is granted, the petition is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to Family Court, Onondaga County, for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: From 2013 to 2015, the parties resided together with their son in northern Virginia. In 2015, respondent mother relocated with the child to central New York. Approximately six months later, petitioner father quit his job in Virginia and moved to New York in order to be closer to the child. The father thereafter petitioned to downwardly modify his child support obligation on the ground that his new job in Onondaga County was less remunerative than his old job in Virginia. The Support Magistrate dismissed the petition, holding that, although the father had made good faith efforts to obtain more lucrative employment in New York, he had not demonstrated the requisite change in circumstances to warrant such a modification because he had voluntarily left his higher-paying job in Virginia. Family Court subsequently denied the father's objection to the Support Magistrate's order. The father now appeals, and we reverse.
"It is well settled that a loss of employment may constitute a change in circumstances justifying a downward modification of [child support] obligations where [such loss] occurred through no fault of the [party seeking modification] and the [party] has diligently sought re-employment" ( Jelfo v. Jelfo, 81 A.D.3d 1255, 1257, 916 N.Y.S.2d 427 [4th Dept. 2011] [internal quotation marks omitted] ). As a general rule, a parent who voluntarily quits a job will not be deemed without fault in losing such employment (see Matter of Lindsay v. Lindsay–Lewis, 156 A.D.3d 642, 643, 64 N.Y.S.3d 564 [2d Dept. 2017] ; Matter of Vasquez v. Powell, 111 A.D.3d 754, 754, 974 N.Y.S.2d 552 [2d Dept. 2013] ; Matter of Rosalind EE. v. William EE., 4 A.D.3d 629, 630, 772 N.Y.S.2d 127 [3d Dept. 2004], lv. denied 3 N.Y.3d 606, 785 N.Y.S.2d 23, 818 N.E.2d 665 [2004] ; Matter of Ludwig v. Reyome, 195 A.D.2d 1020, 1020, 600 N.Y.S.2d 584 [4th Dept. 1993] ). Nevertheless, that general rule should not be inflexibly applied where a parent quits a job for a sufficiently compelling reason, such as the need to live closer to a child (see Matter of Dupree v. Dupree, 62 N.Y.2d 1009, 1010–1012, 479 N.Y.S.2d 491, 468 N.E.2d 673 [1984] ; Matter of Smith v. McCarthy, 143 A.D.3d 726, 727–728, 38 N.Y.S.3d 588 [2d Dept. 2016] ; see also Spencer v. Spencer, 298 A.D.2d 680, 680–681, 748 N.Y.S.2d 809 [3d Dept. 2002] ). As one court has explained, a ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Montgomery v. List
...... should not be inflexibly applied where a parent quits a job for a sufficiently compelling reason " ( Matter of Parmenter v. Nash, 166 A.D.3d 1475, 1476, 87 N.Y.S.3d 759 [4th Dept. 2018], lv dismissed 33 N.Y.3d 996, 101 N.Y.S.3d 727, 125 N.E.3d 143, 2019 WL 1941923 [May 2, 2019] [emphasi......
-
Houck v. Houck
...basis for such a reduction" (Matter of Montgomery v List, 173 A.D.3d 1657, 1658 [4th Dept 2019]; see Matter of Parmenter v Nash, 166 A.D.3d 1475, 1476 [4th Dept 2018], lv dismissed 33 N.Y.3d 996 [2019]). ...
-
Sweeney v. Air Stream Air Conditioning Co.
...not specifically addressed, have been examined and found to be lacking in merit. Garry, P.J., Mulvey, Aarons and Rumsey, JJ., concur.87 N.Y.S.3d 759ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without...
-
Review of the Year 2018-2019 in Family Law: Jurisdiction and Choice of Law Issues Abound
...2018) (dismissing father’s downward modiication petition). 191. Schwier v. Schwier, 446 P.3d 354 (Alaska 2019). 192. Parmenter v. Nash, 87 N.Y.S.3d 759 (App. Div. 2018). Published in Family Law Quarterly, Volume 53, Number 4, Winter 2020. © 2020 American Bar Association. Reproduced with per......