Parramore Farms, Inc. v. John Deere Co., 62459

Decision Date01 October 1981
Docket NumberNo. 62459,62459
Citation285 S.E.2d 233,159 Ga.App. 774
PartiesPARRAMORE FARMS, INC. v. JOHN DEERE COMPANY et al.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

R. Bruce Warren, Thomasville, for appellant.

Dow N. Kirkpatrick II, Earle B. May, Jr., Atlanta, for appellees.

DEEN, Presiding Judge.

1. The construction of a plain and unambiguous contract provision is a question of law for the court. Code § 20-701; Binswanger Glass Co. v. Beers Const. Co., 141 Ga.App. 715, 234 S.E.2d 363 (1977).

2. Where as here a purchase contract provides that under certain circumstances the death of "the eligible debtor" results in payment of life insurance sufficient to cancel the debt owing on the balance of the installment contract, a determination of whether the contingency has occurred is a question of fact which, when shown by uncontroverted evidence to have occurred, will support the grant of summary judgment.

3. The term "the Eligible Debtor," as defined in this contract means a signer or cosigner of the purchase contract under 66 years of age. If signed by two or more individuals the one whose signature appears to the left and uppermost on the contract is the eligible debtor. If the purchaser is a corporation there is no "Eligible Debtor" unless the officer signing for the corporation also signs as an individually liable co-debtor.

The contract involved here was signed Parramore Farms, Inc. On the following line the signature of E. W. Parramore appears on the left and that of M. N. Parramore on the right. The contract was first refused as not binding on the corporation, since it did not show the signature capacity of any authorized officer. It was then re-signed under the corporate name and over the left-hand personal signature of E. W. Parramore by the addition of the signature "E. W. Parramore, V. Pres." immediately under the words "Parramore Farms, Inc.," leaving below the personal signatures of E. W. Parramore on the left and M. N. Parramore on the right. Both men were under the age of 66. M. N. Parramore unexpectedly died. The corporation and E. W. Parramore then claimed that a jury question existed as to whether the decedent was the "Eligible Debtor." Under the undisputed evidence, E. W. Parramore signed in both individual and corporate capacities, and his signature appears to the left of the decedent's. We find no ambiguity, and hold that the grant of summary judgment to the appellees was proper. See to the same effect John Deere Co. v. Atkinson, 252 Ark....

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Foshee v. Harris
    • United States
    • United States Court of Appeals (Georgia)
    • March 6, 1984
    ...of which the terms are unambiguous, is peculiarly well suited for adjudication by summary judgment. Parramore Farms, Inc. v. John Deere Co., 159 Ga.App. 774, 285 S.E.2d 233 (1981); Troutt v. Nash AMC/Jeep, 157 Ga.App. 399, 278 S.E.2d (1981). The cardinal rule of construction is to ascertain......
  • Williams v. State
    • United States
    • United States Court of Appeals (Georgia)
    • October 1, 1981

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT