Parsons v. Estenson Logistics, LLC

Decision Date28 December 2022
Docket NumberC093489
Citation86 Cal.App.5th 1260,302 Cal.Rptr.3d 874
Parties Robert PARSONS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ESTENSON LOGISTICS, LLC, Defendant and Respondent.
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Diversity Law Group, Larry W. Lee, Los Angeles, Max W. Gavron ; Polaris Law Group and William L. Marder, Hollister, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, Michael J. Nader, Kyle Wende, Sacramento, and Kathleen J. Choi, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent.

EARL, J.

Labor Code section 204, subdivision (d), provides that wages for employees who are paid weekly are deemed timely if paid "not more than seven calendar days following the close of the payroll period." What happens if the seventh calendar day falls on a Saturday? Plaintiff and appellant Robert Parsons argues the wages must be paid on that Saturday. Defendant and respondent Estenson Logistics, LLC (Estenson) argues the wages may be paid the following Monday, because Code of Civil Procedure section 12a provides that weekends are holidays, and further provides, "If the last day for the performance of any act provided or required by law to be performed within a specified period of time is a holiday, then that period is hereby extended to and including the next day that is not a holiday." The trial court agreed with Estenson, and granted summary judgment in its favor on a wage and hour claim brought by Parsons. We also agree, and thus affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The relevant facts are both few and undisputed. Parsons works for Estenson, and Estenson pays its employees weekly. Estenson's pay period runs from Sunday through the following Saturday. It pays its employees on the second Monday after the end of the pay period, which is nine calendar days after the end of the pay period. If Monday is a holiday, it pays its employees on Tuesday, which is 10 calendar days after the end of the pay period. So, for example, if the pay period runs from Sunday, January 1 through Saturday, January 7, it would pay its employees on Monday, January 16, and if Monday, January 16 was a holiday, it would pay its employees on Tuesday, January 17.

Parsons contends this practice violates Labor Code section 204, subdivision (d) (hereafter, section 204(d) ), which, as noted above, requires that employees who are paid weekly be paid "not more than seven calendar days following the close of the payroll period." (Italics added.) Parsons thus brought an action under what is known as the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004—or PAGA. ( Lab. Code, § 2698 et seq. ) PAGA allows an employee to bring a civil action against an employer on behalf of himself and other employees to recover civil penalties for violations of the Labor Code.1 ( Lab. Code, § 2699, subd. (a).) In this case, Parsons asserted one cause of action against Estenson, alleging its practice of paying its employees on the ninth calendar day following the close of the pay period violates section 204(d).

Estenson filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing its payroll practices did not violate section 204(d).2 Its argument was based almost entirely on a policies and interpretations manual promulgated by the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE). The DLSE is charged with enforcing most provisions of the Labor Code, ( Lab. Code, § 95 ), and its Enforcement Policies and Interpretations Manual (hereafter, the DLSE Manual) summarizes how it interprets the Labor Code provisions it is charged with enforcing. The DLSE Manual contains the following explanation of what happens when a payday falls on a weekend or a holiday:

"7.6 Wage Payment Where Holidays Occur . Occasionally, the designated payday will fall on a holiday. The question then arises: When are the employees required to be paid? The DLSE has established an enforcement position which relies on the provisions of Sections 7, 9, 10 and 11 of the California Civil Code and on Section 12a of the California Code of Civil Procedure :

" C.C. § 7 : ‘Holidays within the meaning of this code are every Sunday and such other days as are specified or provided for as holidays in the Government Code of the State of California.’

" C.C. § 9 : ‘All other days than those mentioned in Section 7 are business days for all purposes; ...’

" C.C. § 10 : ‘The time in which any act provided by law is to be done is computed by excluding the first day and including the last day, unless the last day is a holiday, and then it is also excluded.’ " C.C. § 11 : ‘Whenever any act of a secular nature, other than a work of necessity or mercy, is appointed by law or contract to be performed upon a particular day, which day falls upon a holiday, it may be performed upon the next business day, with the same effect as if it had been performed upon the day appointed.’

" C.C.P § 12a(a) : ‘If the last day for the performance of any act provided or required by law to be performed within a specified period of time is a holiday, then that period is hereby extended to and including the next day which is not a holiday. For purposes of this section, "holiday" means all day on Saturdays, all holidays specified in Section 135 and, to the extent provided in Section 12b, all days which by terms of Section 12b are required to be considered as holidays.’

"7.6.1 The following days have been designated as holidays by [the] Government Code: January 1, the third Monday in January, February 12, the third Monday in February, March 31, the last Monday in May, July 4, the first Monday in September, the second Monday in October, November 11, Thanksgiving, the day after Thanksgiving and December 25.

"7.6.2 The above statutes have been relied upon by DLSE to allow an employer the option of paying wages due on a Saturday or Sunday (or holiday listed in the Government Code and scheduled as a holiday by the employer) on the next business day. " (Italics added.)3

Based on the DLSE Manual and the statutes cited therein, Estenson argued that because the last day to pay its employees always falls on a Saturday, it had the option of paying them on Monday (or on Tuesday if Monday is a holiday).

Parsons argued the DLSE Manual and the statutes cited therein do not override section 204(d) ’s clear directive that employees must be paid no later than seven calendar days after the close of the payroll period.

The trial court agreed with Estenson, noting that although it was not bound by the DLSE Manual, it found the DLSE's interpretation of the relevant Civil Code and Code of Civil Procedure sections to be both "persuasive" and "reasonable."4

The trial court thus entered judgment in favor of Estenson, and Parsons timely appealed.

DISCUSSION
1. Standard of Review

"We review a grant of summary judgment de novo; we must decide independently whether the facts not subject to triable dispute warrant judgment for the moving party as a matter of law." ( Intel Corp. v. Hamidi (2003) 30 Cal.4th 1342, 1348, 1 Cal.Rptr.3d 32, 71 P.3d 296.) "The proper interpretation of a statute and the application of the statute to undisputed facts are questions of law, which we also review de novo." ( Lazarin v. Superior Court (2010) 188 Cal.App.4th 1560, 1569, 116 Cal.Rptr.3d 596.) We may affirm a ruling granting a motion for summary judgment "if it is correct on any ground, regardless of the trial court's stated reasons." ( Truck Ins. Exchange v. County of Los Angeles (2002) 95 Cal.App.4th 13, 20, 115 Cal.Rptr.2d 179.)

2. Analysis

This case involves the interplay between Labor Code section 204 and Code of Civil Procedure section 12a.5

Labor Code section 204 generally requires that wages be paid at least twice a month, as follows: "All wages ... earned by any person in any employment are due and payable twice during each calendar month, on days designated in advance by the employer as the regular paydays. Labor performed between the 1st and 15th days, inclusive, of any calendar month shall be paid for between the 16th and the 26th day of the month during which the labor was performed, and labor performed between the 16th and the last day, inclusive, of any calendar month, shall be paid for between the 1st and 10th day of the following month." ( Lab. Code, § 204, subd. (a).) For employers, like Estenson, who pay their employees weekly, section 204(d) provides, "The requirements of this section shall be deemed satisfied ... if the wages are paid not more than seven calendar days following the close of the payroll period." ( Lab. Code, § 204, subd. (d), italics added.) Both parties acknowledge this case is governed by section 204(d). Parsons argues that "seven calendar days" means just that, and if the seventh calendar day following the close of the payroll period falls on a Saturday, then wages must be paid on (or before) that Saturday, and paying wages on Monday (or nine calendar days following the close of the payroll period) violates section 204(d). If section 204(d) was the only provision we had to consider, this would be an easy case and we would agree with Parsons. But section 204(d) is not the only provision we have to consider.

Instead, as Estenson notes, Code of Civil Procedure section 12a (hereafter section 12a ) provides, "If the last day for the performance of any act provided or required by law to be performed within a specified period of time is a holiday, then that period is hereby extended to and including the next day that is not a holiday. For purposes of this section, ‘holiday’ means all day on Saturdays[ and] all holidays specified in Section 135." ( Code Civ. Proc., § 12a, subd. (a).) Code of Civil Procedure section 135, in turn, specifies "judicial holidays," which include Saturdays, Sundays, and most major holidays (i.e., Thanksgiving, Christmas, New Year's Day, etc.). ( Code Civ. Proc., § 135 ["Every full day designated as a holiday by Section 6700 of the Government Code ... is a judicial holiday," subject to a few exceptions]; Gov. Code, § 6700 [designating state holidays].) Section 12a thus...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 books & journal articles
  • Wage and Hour Case Notes
    • United States
    • California Lawyers Association California Labor & Employment Law Review (CLA) No. 37-2, March 2023
    • Invalid date
    ...WAGES WITHIN SEVEN DAYS FALLS ON WEEKEND, TIME TO PAY EXTENDED TO NEXT DAY THAT IS NOT A HOLIDAY Parsons v. Estenson Logistics, LLC, 86 Cal. App. 5th 1260 (2022)Robert Parsons filed a PAGA-only lawsuit against Estenson alleging a claim for violation of CAL. LAB. CODE § 204, one of Californi......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT