Pasley v. State

Decision Date02 November 1993
Docket NumberNo. 92-1767,92-1767
Citation625 So.2d 1303
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals
Parties18 Fla. L. Weekly D2348 James L. PASLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Glen P. Gifford, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Amelia L. Beisner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant's convictions for both possession of more than 20 grams of cannabis and possession of cannabis with intent to sell violate the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy. See Lundy v. State, 596 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). Accordingly, appellant's conviction for possession of more than 20 grams of cannabis is reversed. In all other respects, the convictions and sentences are affirmed.

BARFIELD, WOLF and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Palmer v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 2, 1993
  • Williams v. State, 96-1657
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 17, 1997
    ...and possession of the same quantity of cannabis. Relying on Burke v. State, 640 So.2d 1222 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) and Pasley v. State, 625 So.2d 1303 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993), Williams contends that a defendant may not be convicted of both possession of cannabis with intent to sell or deliver and p......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT