Pasley v. State
Decision Date | 02 November 1993 |
Docket Number | No. 92-1767,92-1767 |
Citation | 625 So.2d 1303 |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Parties | 18 Fla. L. Weekly D2348 James L. PASLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Glen P. Gifford, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Amelia L. Beisner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.
Appellant's convictions for both possession of more than 20 grams of cannabis and possession of cannabis with intent to sell violate the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy. See Lundy v. State, 596 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). Accordingly, appellant's conviction for possession of more than 20 grams of cannabis is reversed. In all other respects, the convictions and sentences are affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial- Palmer v. State
-
Williams v. State, 96-1657
...and possession of the same quantity of cannabis. Relying on Burke v. State, 640 So.2d 1222 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) and Pasley v. State, 625 So.2d 1303 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993), Williams contends that a defendant may not be convicted of both possession of cannabis with intent to sell or deliver and p......