Pastour v. Kolb Hardware, Inc.
Decision Date | 09 December 1969 |
Docket Number | No. 53224,53224 |
Citation | 173 N.W.2d 116 |
Parties | David PASTOUR and Doris Pastour, Appellees, v. KOLB HARDWARE, INC., and Thermogas Company, Appellants. |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
Boyle & Schuler, Clear Lake, for Kolb Hardware, Inc., appellant.
Levinson, Bryant & Enabnit, Mason City, for Thermogas Co., appellant.
Hobson, Cady & Drew, Hampton, for appellees.
This is an action at law against suppliers of liquid petroleum gas for damages to plaintiffs' farm home and contents on March 20, 1964 as a result of a high pressure fire which started in their kitchen stove. Defendants have appealed from judgment on verdict for plaintiffs. We affirm.
For approximately 20 years prior to March 20, 1964 plaintiffs, David and Doris Pastour, husband and wife, owned a farm two miles east of Alexander and occupied the seven room frame house located thereon. Their original kitchen stove which used LP gas was purchased and installed in 1948. Their first fuel supplier, Muhlenbruch Hardware Company, sold out to defendant Kolb Hardware, Inc., in 1959. The sale included transfer of ownership of a regulator and two gas tanks or cylinders being used on plaintiffs' premises. The same regulator was furnished from 1948 until the fire. The tanks were changed as a new supply of gas was needed. In 1960 plaintiffs purchased a new Tappan four burner LP gas stove which was installed together with new tubing by the vendor, Elliott Hardware Company. A location change of the stove necessitated moving Kolb's regulator and tanks. Without interruption Kolb continued to furnish the same regulator and delivered new tanks of gas as needed. Kolb delivered and installed one gas cylinder to plaintiffs' home on October 23, 1963 and a second cylinder on December 24, 1963. They were in place at the time of the fire. At no time did plaintiffs attempt to adjust or tamper with the regulator or cylinders. They were cared for only by Kolb's employees.
When Kolb had on hand several empty cylinders an employee hauled them to the plant of defendant Thermogas Company at Mason City where they were exchanged for 100 lb. cylinders which Thermogas had filled with LP gas. This arrangement between defendants had been carried out for several years before the event here involved.
On the morning of March 20, 1964 Mrs. Pastour used the stove for cooking breakfast and again used it in preparing the noon meal. As it had done for several years, the stove functioned properly. About five forty that afternoon while her husband was in the kitchen Mrs. Pastour went to the stove to make coffee. As she had always done before, she turned on a burner. To her surprise flames roared eight to twelve inches high. She immediately turned off the burner and it went out. When the burner flamed up she was frightened and startled. She walked across the kitchen from the stove to telephone Kolb but decided to turn it on again before making a call. When she turned the burner on a second time it again flamed and roared 'real loud'. Her attempt to shut it off was in vain. Flames were not only shooting from the burner but from the pilot light and under the entire top of the stove. The flames shot up and out the back of the stove. Curtains were set on fire. Mr. Pastour ran out of the kitchen to shut the gas off at the tanks. Mrs. Pastour was unable to reach the fire department on the telephone. She then went to the kitchen sink and began throwing water on the flames. She was then blown out the kitchen door. She was blistered around her hairline and her hair singed. She testified: 'It just went 'whoof' and I was right out the door.' The inside of the kitchen was engulfed with flame and smoke. The house was damaged beyond repair.
Her later direct examination includes the following:
'Mr. Cady: Now, then, describe the explosion a little more in detail and what happened? Mrs. Pastour: Well, it was just like a big ---
'Mr. Boyle: Excuse me. We move to strike the word 'explosion' as having been injected by counsel, there never yet having been any testimony by this witness in regard to any explosion.
'The Court: The objection will be overruled.
The inside door was open. She was blown out the closed outside kitchen door.
A few days after the event here involved a Kolb employee at the direction of Thermogas' manager removed the two cylinders or tanks and the regulator and took them to Kolb's place of business.
Several weeks after the event an experienced appliance repairman made a visual inspection of the stove in the kitchen where it had remained unmoved. He checked the connections and tubing from where the regulator had been and run to the stove. They were in normal condition. He removed the tubing and took it to his shop for testing. No breaks or defects were found.
University of Science and Technology, was called as a witness by plaintiffs. He has many degrees including Master of Science. He has been a member of the staff at Iowa State since January 1926. His teaching includes lectures to fire fighters. Through the years he has inspected the sites of various fires and explosions for lawyers, insurance companies, gas companies and municipal officers. His experience and competency are not challenged here.
His testimony summarized in the record includes:
* * *
* * *
* * *
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ackerman v. James
...fairly reach no other conclusion. Giarratano v. The Weitz Co., Inc., 259 Iowa 1292, 1309, 147 N.W.2d 824, 835; Pastour v. Kolb Hardware, Inc., 173 N.W.2d 116, 124 (Iowa 1969); Ives v. Swift & Company, 183 N.W.2d at 176; rule 344(f)(10), In ruling on a motion for directed verdict, the court ......
-
Scittarelli v. Providence Gas Co.
...167 (Mo.App.1944); Pernick v. Central Union Gas Co., 183 App.Div. 543, 544, 170 N.Y.S. 245, 248 (1918); see Pastour v. Kolb Hardware, Inc., 173 N.W.2d 116, 125-26 (Iowa 1969) (expert testimony on workings of stove established facts from which the likelihood of defendant's negligence could b......
-
Wiles v. Myerly
...Construction Co., 159 N.W.2d 463, 465--468 (Iowa 1968); Sweet v. Swangel, 166 N.W.2d 776, 778--779 (Iowa 1969); Pastour v. Kolb Hardware Inc., 173 N.W.2d 116, 125 (Iowa 1969); Wilson v. Paul, 176 N.W.2d 807, 809--811 (Iowa 1970); Fischer, Inc. v. Standard Brands, Inc., 204 N.W.2d 579, 583--......
-
Fischer, Inc. v. Standard Brands, Inc.
...opportunity to correct or eliminate the defect. A general objection is not sufficient on which to rely on appeal. Pastour v. Kolb Hardware, Inc., Iowa, 173 N.W.2d 116, 124; In re Estate of Ronfeldt, 261 Iowa 12, 27, 152 N.W.2d 837, 846; Kunzman v. Cherokee Silo Co., 253 Iowa 885, 893, 114 N......