Patel v. Georgia Power Co.
| Citation | 234 Ga. App. 141,505 S.E.2d 787 |
| Decision Date | 10 August 1998 |
| Docket Number | No. A98A2392, No. A98A2393. |
| Parties | PATEL v. GEORGIA POWER COMPANY. GEORGIA POWER COMPANY v. PATEL. |
| Court | United States Court of Appeals (Georgia) |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Mark B. McManus, Roswell, for appellant.
Dye, Tucker, Everitt, Wheale & Long, A. Rowland Dye, Augusta, Swift, Currie, McGhee & Hiers, W. Ray Persons, Atlanta, for appellee.
In this tort action to recover for personal injuries plaintiff Bhavna Patel received at a public park located on property owned by defendant Georgia Power Company, the trial court granted summary judgment to defendant in an order filed on Tuesday, January 13, 1998. In Case No. A98A2392, plaintiff's notice of appeal was filed on February 13, 1998. In Case No. A98A2393, defendant's notice of cross-appeal was filed on February 28, 1998. Held:
1. "A notice of appeal shall be filed within 30 days after entry of the appealable decision or judgment complained of...." OCGA § 5-6-38(a). Moncrief v. Tara Apts., Ltd., 162 Ga.App. 695, 293 S.E.2d 352. A notice of appeal filed on February 13, 1998, from an order entered on January 13, 1998, is not timely, in the absence of a proper extension of time. In Case No. A98A2392, we are without jurisdiction over this appeal, and it must be dismissed. Moncrief v. Tara Apts., Ltd., 162 Ga.App. 695, 293 S.E.2d 352, supra; Smith v. Forrester, 145 Ga.App. 281, 243 S.E.2d 575.
2. Defendant's cross-appeal complains of the August 19, 1996, order of the trial court denying defendant's motion to transfer venue.
" Guy v. Roberson, 214 Ga.App. 391, 392(2), 448 S.E.2d 60. In the case sub judice, the trial court's denial of defendant Georgia Power Company's motion to transfer venue is not a final appealable judgment within the meaning of OCGA § 5-6-34(a)(1). Rather, that ruling is subject to the certification requirement and application procedures for interlocutory appeal of OCGA § 5-6-34(b). Griffith v. Ga. Bd. of Dentistry, 175 Ga.App. 533, 333 S.E.2d 647. Consequently, since the main appeal in Case No. A98A2392 must be dismissed in its entirety, and defendant filed no application under OCGA § 5-6-34(b) for interlocutory review of the denial of its motion to transfer venue, we have no independent jurisdiction over the cross-appeal in Case No. A98A2393, and the same must be dismissed. Hutchison v. Nat. Svcs. Indu., Inc., 191 Ga.App. 885, 886(3), 383 S.E.2d 212. Accord Guy v. Roberson, 214 Ga.App. 391, 392(2), 393, 448 S.E.2d 60, supra.
Appeal dismissed in the main appeal, Case No. A98A2392, and also dismissed in the cross-appeal, Case No. A98A2393.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Trammel v. CLAYTON COUNTY BD.
...an independent appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-48(e); Burns v. Howard, 239 Ga.App. 315, 317, 520 S.E.2d 491 (1999); Patel v. Ga. Power Co., 234 Ga. App. 141, 142(2), 505 S.E.2d 787 (1998); Roberts v. Pearce, 232 Ga.App. 417, 418, 501 S.E.2d 555 The defendants' cross-appeal is based upon the denial o......
-
Parker v. State
... ... App. 137PARKER ... The STATE ... No. A98A1141 ... Court of Appeals of Georgia ... August 10, 1998 ... Reconsideration Denied August 28, 1998 ... 505 S.E.2d ... ...
-
Trey Inman & Associates, P.C. v. Bank of Am., N.A.
...804(3), 463 S.E.2d 507 (1995). 4 Standridge v. Spillers, 263 Ga.App. 401, 402-403(1), 587 S.E.2d 862 (2003). 5 Patel v. Ga. Power Co., 234 Ga.App. 141, 142(2), 505 S.E.2d 787 (1998). 6 Jones Roofing, etc., Co. v. Roberts, 179 Ga.App. 169, 170(2), 345 S.E.2d 683 (1986). 7 Studdard v. Satcher......
-
State, Dept. of Transp. v. Douglas Asphalt Co.
...the dismissal of the main appeal, this is true only where the cross-appeal can stand on its own merit." (Punctuation omitted.) Patel v. Ga. Power Co.3 See Jones Roofing etc. Co. v. Roberts.4 "This [C]ourt has no jurisdiction to entertain a cross-appeal which must derive its life from the ma......