Patterson v. Brooks, 3 Div. 444
Decision Date | 05 March 1970 |
Docket Number | 3 Div. 444 |
Citation | 232 So.2d 598,285 Ala. 349 |
Parties | Merle H. PATTERSON, as Executrix, etc. v. John BROOKS et al. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Alfred W. Goldthwaite, Montgomery, for appellant.
Fred S. Ball, Montgomery, for appellees.
This appeal is from a decree approving a bonus of $7,100.00 payable to the executrix of the estate of a deceased employee. We affirm.
The testator, Richard H. Patterson, had worked for Ray-Brooks Machinery Co., Inc., a corporation, the stock of which is owned by John Brooks, Jr., the President of the Company, his mother, and one outside stockholder who owns three shares. For several years prior to his death, Patterson was Sales Manager for the Company. He died on January 29, 1969, and the fiscal year of the company ended on February 28, 1969. For that fiscal year, the company lost over $90,000.00. In the three preceding years, the profits of the company had been: 1966--over $113,000.00; 1967--over $32,000.00, and 1968--over $51,000.00. For those same years, Patterson had received a bonus as follows: 1966--$13,600.00; 1967--$10,800.00, and 1968--$14,200.00. The bonus for the fiscal year in which he died, 1969, was $7,100.00. Although the bonus of various officers and employees was not paid until May of each year, this suit, alleging that the bonus due Patterson was in jeopardy, was filed on April 22, 1969.
After a hearing before the court, the following decree was entered September 29, 1969:
'The court having previously sustained the demurrer of the respondents, John Brooks and Mrs. Louise Brooks, leaving only the respondent, Ray-Brooks Machinery Company, Inc., a corporation, and the cause coming on to be heard by the court and the parties and their counsel being present, and the evidence being heard orally by the court, and the issue being whether said corporation is indebted to the complainant for an additional amount due as a bonus for services rendered by the testator during the corporation's fiscal year, ending February 28, 1969, at the time of the testator's death on January 29, 1969, the court finds as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ex parte Douthit
...supported by credible evidence under any reasonable aspect, regardless of what might be our view of the evidence. Patterson v. Brooks, 285 Ala. 349, 232 So.2d 598 (1970). When the trial court hears evidence presented ore tenus, its judgment is presumed correct and will not be disturbed unle......
-
Green v. Green, 2160986
...have reached a different conclusion. Porter v. Porter, 46 Ala. App. 22, 237 So.2d 507 [ (Ala. Civ. App. 1970) ] ; Patterson v. Brooks, 285 Ala. 349, 232 So.2d 598 [ (1970) ] ; Kyser v. Doan, 271 Ala. 229, 122 So.2d 764 [ (1960) ]." Harrell v. Long, 49 Ala. App. 322, 324, 272 So.2d 248, 250 ......
-
Dennison v. Claiborne
...Furniture Salvage of Mobile, Inc., 276 Ala. 394, 162 So.2d 488; Dunlavy v. Dunlavy, 283 Ala. 303, 216 So.2d 281.' Patterson v. Brooks, 285 Ala. 349, 232 So.2d 598 (1970). '* * * the findings and conclusions of fact made by a trial court, based on testimony taken ore tenus, are presumed to b......
-
Hinds v. Slack
...by the trial judge, who not only heard all witnesses, but was able to observe their demeanor on the stand. See Patterson v. Brooks, 285 Ala. 349, 232 So.3d 598 (1970); Dennison v. Claiborne, 289 Ala. 69, 265 So.2d 853 Assignment VI dealing with the admissibility of certain evidence was not ......