Patterson v. Smith

Decision Date11 January 1971
Docket NumberNo. 26193,26193
Citation227 Ga. 170,179 S.E.2d 247
PartiesJerry PATTERSON v. S. Lamont SMITH, Warden.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Jerry Patterson, pro se.

Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., Harold N. Hill, Jr., Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., Marion O. Gordon, Charles B. Merrill, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Atlanta, for appellee.

Syllabus Opinion by the Court

NICHOLS, Justice.

The petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in which he asserted that two sentences imposed by the Superior Court of Gwinnett County were illegally imposed upon him. The trial court remanded the petitioner to custody and he filed the present appeal. Held:

1. 'The legality of the present confinement is the question under review in a habeas corpus proceeding. See Harris v. Norris, 188 Ga. 610, 611, 4 S.E.2d 840; Dutton v. Knight, 223 Ga. 140, 153 S.E.2d 714.' Evans v. Perkins, 225 Ga. 48, 50, 165 S.E.2d 652, 654.

2. The sentences attacked were by their express terms to be served consecutively to the sentences the prisoner was then serving, as provided for by the Act of 1964 (Ga.L.1964, p. 494; Code Ann. § 27-2510). Under the undisputed evidence adduced at the hearing the petitioner's present confinement is not under the sentences attacked, but under prior sentences, and the trial court did not err in remanding the petitioner to the custody of the Warden of the State prison.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • State ex rel. Jackson v. Henderson
    • United States
    • Louisiana Supreme Court
    • 23 novembre 1971
    ...traditional common-law limitations upon the use of habeas corpus to question the prisoner's present detention. See: Patterson v. Smith, 227 Ga. 170, 179 S.E.2d 247 (1971); Wright v. Bennett, 257 Iowa 61, 131 N.W.2d 455 (1964); Ramsey v. Hand, 183 Kan. 307, 327 P.2d 1080 (1958); People ex re......
  • Creamer v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 26 septembre 1972
    ...is the legality of the present confinement of the petitioner. See Lewis v. Smith, 227 Ga. 220, 179 S.E.2d 745; Patterson v. Smith, 227 Ga. 170, 179 S.E.2d 247. There being no evidence submitted showing that the confinement of the defendant was illegal per se and there being no evidence that......
  • Patterson v. State, 26823
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 18 novembre 1971
    ...which judgment no appeal was filed. The denial of his petition for the writ of habeas corpus was affirmed by this court. Patterson v. Smith, 227 Ga. 170, 179 S.E.2d 247. Thereafter, appellant filed an extraordinary motion for new trial, in which he attempted to raise for the first time the ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT