Patton v. State
Decision Date | 10 June 2003 |
Docket Number | No. 49A02-0211-PC-975.,49A02-0211-PC-975. |
Citation | 789 N.E.2d 968 |
Parties | Keith PATTON, Appellant-Petitioner, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Respondent. |
Court | Indiana Appellate Court |
Daniel M. Grove, Special Assistant to the Public Defender of Indiana, Indianapolis, IN, Attorney for Appellant.
Steve Carter, Attorney General of Indiana, Ellen H. Meilaender, Deputy Attorney General, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellee.
Appellant-petitioner Keith Patton appeals the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
Patton raises six issues for review, which we consolidate and restate as follows:
I. Whether our supreme court's reversal of his murder conviction invalidated his guilty plea;
II. Whether several of his convictions violate double jeopardy III. Whether his guilty plea to attempted murder was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent; and
IV. Whether he may challenge trial counsel's statements during voir dire regarding his guilty plea.
Shortly after midnight on October 22, 1983, after consuming eighty ounces of beer between them, seventeen-year-olds Patton and Leroy Johnson approached a parked car in Washington Park in Indianapolis. Michael Pack and Dietra Maxey were sitting in the driver's and passenger's seats, and Maxey's four-year-old daughter was sleeping in the back seat. Patton shot out the driver's-side window with a sawed-off twelve-gauge shotgun, seriously injuring Maxey. When Pack attempted to start the car, Johnson shot the passenger's-side rear tire with his sawed-off twenty-gauge shotgun. Patton said, then fired his shotgun a second time, killing Pack. Trial Tr. at 928. Patton ordered Maxey out of the car and led her away from the scene, leaving her daughter behind. Both Patton and Johnson had sexual, oral, and anal intercourse with Maxey, and Patton inserted his shotgun into Maxey's vagina.1
On October 28, 1983, the State charged Patton with murder2 and with two counts of Class A felony rape,3 one of which was later dismissed. On November 28, 1983, the State filed an information for death sentence. On January 24, 1984, under a separate cause number,4 the State charged Patton with attempted murder,5 Class B felony criminal confinement,6 three counts of Class A felony criminal deviate conduct,7 and dealing in a sawed-off shotgun.8 These causes were later consolidated under cause number CR83-232D.
On June 1, 1984, Patton signed a document wherein he agreed to plead guilty as charged, acknowledged that the State would continue to seek the death penalty, and agreed to transfer the consolidated causes from Judge Patricia Gifford to Judge Thomas E. Alsip for guilty plea proceedings. That same day, Judge Gifford appointed Judge Alsip as a special judge to hear the cause. In July 1984, Judge Alsip accepted Patton's guilty plea and sentenced him to death on the murder conviction, thirty years on the rape conviction, and 132 years on the remaining convictions.9 Patton appealed only his murder and rape convictions. In December 1987, our supreme court determined that Patton had protested his innocence to the murder charge at the sentencing hearing and reversed and remanded "for trial on that charge and sentencing on the rape charge." Patton v. State, 517 N.E.2d 374, 376 (Ind.1987) ("Patton I").10
Upon remand, the cause was venued to Judge Gifford. Patton unsuccessfully challenged Judge Gifford's jurisdiction. See State ex rel. Patton v. Superior Court of Marion County, 547 N.E.2d 255 (Ind. 1989)
( )("Patton II"). In March 1990, a jury convicted Patton of murder and recommended against the death penalty. Judge Gifford sentenced Patton to sixty years for murder, to be served concurrently with his thirty-year rape sentence and consecutive to the 132-year sentence on his other convictions. Patton then appealed his murder conviction, which our supreme court affirmed. See Patton v. State, 588 N.E.2d 494 (Ind.1992) ("Patton III").
In 1996, Patton filed pro se a petition for post-conviction relief, which was subsequently amended by counsel. On December 19, 2001, the post-conviction court held a hearing on Patton's petition. On August 22, 2002, the post-conviction court denied Patton's petition. Patton now appeals.
At the outset, we note the appropriate standard of review:
Williams v. State, 706 N.E.2d 149, 153-54 (Ind.1999) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1113, 120 S.Ct. 1970, 146 L.Ed.2d 800 (2000).
Id. at 146. Finally, paragraph 7 of the plea agreement provides, "The agreement embodies the entire agreement between the parties and no promises have been made or inducements given to the defendant by the State which are not part of this written agreement." Id. at 152.
Griffin v. State, 756 N.E.2d 572, 574 (Ind. Ct.App.2001) (citations and quotation marks omitted), trans. denied (2002).
We agree with the post-conviction court's conclusion that Appellant's App. at 138. Given that the guilty plea document "embodies the entire agreement between the parties," we cannot conclude that the plea agreement was invalidated by the Patton I court's reversal of his murder conviction.
trans. denied. Such is not the case here. Patton has failed to establish that he is entitled to relief on this ground.
A person may not be convicted of attempted murder without proof that the person specifically intended to kill his victim. Spradlin v. State, 569 N.E.2d 948, 949-50 (Ind.1991). Patton was never advised prior to the entry and acceptance of his guilty plea that the State, in order to obtain a conviction for attempted murder, was required to prove that Patton specifically intended to kill Maxey when he shot into the vehicle. Patton argues that his plea of guilty to the attempted murder charge was therefore invalid.
Before a trial court...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Patton v. State
...because trial counsel made improper statements regarding Patton's guilty plea during voir dire in the jury trial. Patton v. State, 789 N.E.2d 968, 976 (Ind.Ct.App.2003). The Court of Appeals accepted the first of these four claims, finding that Patton's guilty plea to attempted murder was n......
-
Fair v. State
...violations do not always constitute fundamental error. Taylor v. State, 717 N.E.2d 90, 95 n.7 (Ind. 1999). See also Patton v. State, 789 N.E.2d 968, 974 (Ind. Ct. App. 2003) (rejecting defendant's double jeopardy argument and declining to find fundamental error where defendant pled guilty t......
- Crow v. State, 87A01-0301-CR-5.
-
Transgender Inopportunity and Inequality: Evaluating the Crossroads Between Immigration and Transgender Individuals
...rationally related to a legitimate state interest." City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Ctr., 473 U.S. 432, 432 (1985). 78. Goodridge, 789 N.E.2d at 968. 79. Id. at 948, 957. 80. Id. at 967-68. 81. See Gill v. Office of Pers. Mgmt., 699 F. Supp. 2d 374, 376, 387 (D. Mass. 2010). 82. Id. at ......