Paul v. City Of Wash.
Decision Date | 08 March 1904 |
Citation | 114 N.C. 363,47 S.E. 793 |
Parties | PAUL . v. CITY OF WASHINGTON. |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
intoxicating liquors—municipal corporations—reasonableness—equitable belief—injunction—scope.
1. An injunction will not lie to restrain a city from enforcing ordinances regulating the liquor traffic within its corporate limits, and from revoking and canceling complainant's license for violation thereof, and to declare such ordinances void on the ground that they impose unreasonable, vexatious, and oppressive restrictions on the business of selling liquors by those licensed to do so by the city authorities.
2. Under Priv. Laws 1903, c. 170, p. 362, § 18, incorporating the city of W., and providing that the board of aldermen of such city shall have power to regulate, control, license, or prevent the sale of spirituous, vinous, and malt liquors, and preserve the peace, order, and tranquillity of the city, such board had power to pass reasonable ordinances to restrict and regulate the liquor traffic in such city, and to prohibit the same, at their election.
3. City ordinances regulating the liquor traffic prohibited the use of any contrivance obstructing the view of the interior of the saloon from the outside: required all liquors to be served and drunk at the counter; prohibited the use of tables, lounges, etc.; declared that the saloon keepers, their servants or employes, should not use any side or rear doors, trap doors, elevators, or stairways for the purpose of selling or delivering liquor; established business hours between 6 o'clock in the morning and 8 o'clock in the evening; prohibited the saloon keeper or his employes from being in the saloon during closing hours; prohibited the use of billiard tables, pool tables, gaming devices, tenpin alleys, or other devices in saloons; and also prohibited the maintaining of any restaurant or committee rooms connected with the barroom of the saloon, or in the same building where liquors were sold, unless the places were separated by one or more solid perpendicular walls, with no openings of any kind therein; and authorized the board of aldermen to revoke the license of a saloon keeper, in addition to the imposition of a fine, for breach of such regulations. Held, that such regulations were not objectionable as unreasonable.
Appeal from' Superior Court, Beaufort County; Hoke, Judge.
Bill by Smith Paul against the city of Washington to restrain defendant from enforcing certain liquor ordinances. From an order dissolving a restraining order, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
This is an appeal of the plaintiff from an order made by Judge Hoke in which he dissolved a restraining order theretofore made in the case. The plaintiff was, before the 1st day of January, 1904, and at the time this action was commenced (January 18, 1904), engaged in retailing liquor in the city of Washington, N. C, in a large two-story brick building situated at the corner of Main street and Whitecar alley. There is a front door upon Main street and a side door upon Whitecar alley, and also a door from the rear of the building opening into the lot upon which the building stands; and there has been, and still is, a cellar beneath the building, with a trapdoor leading to the cellar, and the cellar has been used and could be used for storage purposes. Prior to the 1st day of January, 1904, the plaintiff rented out the second story of the building as a general restaurant, and a part of the time conducted the same on his own account. On the 4th of November, 1903, the board of aldermen of the city of Washington enacted and adopted (to go into effect on the 1st day of January, 3904) the following ordinances:
Any person, firm or corporation, his or their agents, servants or employees who shall violate this section shall upon conviction be fined fifty dollars.
To continue reading
Request your trial