Payne v. Fraley

Decision Date19 November 1901
PartiesPAYNE et al. v. FRALEY et ux.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from circuit court, Oregon county; W. N. Evans, Judge.

Suit by W. H. Payne and others against W. H. Fraley and wife. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal. Affirmed.

A. H. Livingston, for appellants. A. P. Couch, for respondents.

ROBINSON, J.

This is a proceeding by plaintiffs, as execution creditors of the defendant W. H. Fraley, to have declared fraudulent and void as against them a certain deed conveying the property therein named to Susan M. Fraley, the wife of and codefendant with said W. H. Fraley, and that same be ordered sold for the satisfaction of their judgment and execution against said W. H. Fraley. To the petition filed defendants answered, denying the allegations thereof, and setting up that the land was exempt from execution under the homestead laws of this state. It is upon the question alone of defendants' rights under the statutes concerning homesteads that this appeal is prosecuted. The facts that were undisputed at the trial are that the defendant W. H. Fraley purchased the lots in controversy on September 22, 1888, of one George W. Nettleton, taking a written contract for a deed on payment of $105, the purchase price thereof; that shortly thereafter he paid Nettleton for said lots, and at once built a dwelling house thereon, worth $600 or $800, in which he with his family have ever since lived and occupied as their only home; that on October 25, 1893, said W. H. Fraley assigned said written contract with said George W. Nettleton to his wife, Susan M. Fraley, for the expressed consideration of $1, but in fact without any consideration being paid therefor, and that on same day said Nettleton made and executed and delivered to defendants a deed conveying the lots named in said contract to the defendant Susan M. Fraley, and same was afterward, on November 14, 1893, placed of record in...

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • Lewis v. Barnes
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • December 1, 1917
    ...7, p. 698, 1 Wagner's Stat. 1872; Acreback v. Myer, 165 Mo. 685, 65 S.W. 1015; Barton v. Walker, 165 Mo. 25, 65 S.W. 293; Payne v. Fraley, 165 Mo. 191, 65 S.W. 292; Keeline v. Sealy, 257 Mo. 498, 165 S.W. Sperry v. Cook, 247 Mo. 132, 152 S.W. 318.] But citations of authorities are stale and......
  • Lewis v. Barnes
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • December 1, 1917
    ...St. 1872; Acreback v. Myer, 165 Mo. loc. cit. 685, 65 S. W. 1015; Barton v. Walker, 165 Mo. loc. cit. 30, 65 S. W. 293; Payne v. Fraley, 165 Mo. 191, 65 S. W. 292; Keeline v. Sealy, 257 Mo. 498, 165 S. W. 1088; Sperry v. Cook, 247 Mo. 132, 152 S. W. 318. But citations of authorities are sta......
  • Dent v. Dent
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • November 10, 1942
    ... ... Harmon, 16 Mo.App ... l. c. 208; Keeline v. Sealy, 257 Mo. l. c. 514; ... Crary v. Standard Inv. Co., 285 S.W. 462; Payne ... v. Fraley, 165 Mo. 191; First Natl. Bank v ... Woelz, 197 Mo.App. l. c. 693; Butler v. Roer, ... 163 Mo.App. 283; Acreback v. Myer, ... ...
  • Volker-Scowcroft Lumber Co. v. Vance
    • United States
    • Utah Supreme Court
    • February 6, 1907
    ...Cases, 22 Gratt. [Va.], 266, 12 Am. Rep. 507; Willard v. Masterson [Ill.], 43 N.E. 771; Robinson v. Wilson, 15 Kan. 595; Payne v. Fraley [Mo.], 65 S.W. 292, 21 Cyc. Smith v. Richards [Idaho], 21 P. 419; Garland v. B. R. Irr. Co., 9 Utah 350, 164 U.S. ; Sanford v. Kunkel [Utah], 85 P. 364.) ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT