Payne v. State

Decision Date13 November 1986
Docket NumberNo. 68180,68180
Citation11 Fla. L. Weekly 589,498 So.2d 413
Parties11 Fla. L. Weekly 589 Ricky J. PAYNE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal--Direct Conflict of Decisions; First District--Case No. BA-314.

Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, Second Judicial Circuit, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for petitioner.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Barbara Ann Butler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jacksonville, and Kenneth Muszynski, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This is a petition to review Payne v. State, 480 So.2d 202 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), in which the district court held that the trial court did not err in considering Payne's habitual offender status as a reason for departure from sentencing guidelines. We find conflict with Whitehead v. State, 498 So.2d 863 (Fla.1986). * While we approve Payne's conviction, we remand to the district court with directions to return this cause to the trial court for resentencing consistent with Whitehead.

It is so ordered.

McDonald, C.J., and ADKINS, BOYD, EHRLICH, SHAW and BARKETT, JJ., concur.

OVERTON, J., dissents with an opinion.

OVERTON, Justice, dissenting.

I dissent for the reasons expressed in my dissent in Whitehead v. State, 498 So.2d 863 (Fla.1986).

* We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Hall v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • August 5, 1987
    ...v. State, 481 So.2d 1294 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Payne v. State, 480 So.2d 202 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985) (on motion for rehearing), reversed, 498 So.2d 413 (Fla.1986); and Whitehead v. State, 467 So.2d 779 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), reversed, 498 So.2d 863 (Fla.1986), but reversed and remanded for resente......
  • Harrell v. State, 98-165.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 18, 1998
    ...review, the trial court's jurisdiction to act in a matter is lost. Payne v. State, 493 So.2d 1104 (Fla. 1st DCA), approved, 498 So.2d 413 (Fla.1986)(after discretionary review in the supreme court is sought, trial court and district court lose jurisdiction over the cause to the extent that ......
  • Everage v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 4, 1987
    ...for resentencing because of the error in retaining jurisdiction. Payne v. State, 480 So.2d 202 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), modified, 498 So.2d 413 (Fla.1987) (Payne I ). Payne then filed a petition for review in the Florida Supreme Court and, while this petition was pending, the trial court procee......
  • Vicknair v. State, 86-961
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • February 5, 1987
    ...the time the state was seeking discretionary review in the supreme court. Payne v. State, 493 So.2d 1104 (Fla. 1st DCA), approved, 498 So.2d 413 (Fla.1986), holds that after discretionary review in the supreme court is sought, the trial court (as well as the district court of appeal) loses ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT