Peace River Elec. Corp. v. Choate, AI-332

Decision Date05 August 1982
Docket NumberNo. AI-332,AI-332
Citation417 So.2d 831
PartiesPEACE RIVER ELECTRIC CORP. and Employers Insurance of Wausau, Appellants, v. David Cline CHOATE, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Ivan Matusek, St. Petersburg, for appellants.

Richard A. Kupfer, of Cone, Wagner, Nugent, Johnson, Hazouri & Roth, P. A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

WIGGINTON, Judge.

To forestall what appears to be an incipient creeping of hybrid case law into the field of workers' compensation, this Court has grown increasingly more reticent to recite facts that would lend themselves as a potent source of fertilizer to nurture budding compensation disputes. Nevertheless, despite the risk that we may be plowing fertile grounds for litigious seed, we are strongly impelled to set forth our holding today as we affirm the deputy commissioner's order. The circumstances of this case are unique and fraught with human misery, and we caution that this opinion should not be loosely interpreted by practitioners in the workers' compensation field.

Claimant was left a paraplegic and confined to a wheelchair as a result of a compensable industrial accident in 1975. He had worked as a lineman for Peace River Electric Corporation for eighteen years, and was working in that capacity on the day of the accident when he fell fifteen feet from a power pole to land on his back on a protruding pedestal stub. He is now fifty-seven years old.

Claimant was accepted as permanently and totally disabled. He has lost all sensation and control from his waist downward, including control over bowel and bladder functions. There is no prospect for improvement. The carrier acknowledges that some form of special housing accommodations are required for Choate.

Claimant is presently existing by himself in a dilapidated makeshift dwelling consisting of an ancient trailer and a ramshackle wooden shed that are difficult or impossible to negotiate by wheelchair. Pursuant to his claim, the deputy awarded claimant an "Enabler II" modular home, specifically designed as a wheelchair-accessible environment. All title and right of ownership would remain in the carrier but claimant would be entitled to live in the home rent free. Major maintenance would be the responsibility of the carrier. Additionally, the carrier would provide adequate insurance, while claimant assumed liability for all real estate taxes and assessments on the property. In the event claimant failed to pay such taxes and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
23 cases
  • R & T Const. Co. v. Judge
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • September 1, 1989
    ...Derebery v. Pitt County Fire Marshall, 347 S.E.2d 814 (N.C.1986) rev'g, 76 N.C.App. 67, 332 S.E.2d 94 (1985); Peace River Electric Corp. v. Choate, 417 So.2d 831 (Fla.App.1982), Pet. for Rev. dism., 429 So.2d 7 (Fla.1983). This is to be contrasted with cases from other jurisdictions which n......
  • Squeo v. Comfort Control Corp.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • July 3, 1985
    ...pursuant to statute that provided for furnishing such apparatus to workmen as nature of injury required). In Peace River Elec. Corp. v. Choate, 417 So.2d 831 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1982), petition for review dismissed, 429 So.2d 7 (Fla.1983), the court ordered that claimant be awarded rent-free u......
  • R & T Const. Co. v. Judge
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • September 1, 1990
    ...for persons using wheelchairs, has been awarded in two reported decisions. The use of such a home was ordered in Peace River Elec. Corp. v. Choate, 417 So.2d 831 (Fla.App.1982), where the insurer acknowledged that it was required to furnish some form of special housing accommodations. Dereb......
  • Perun v. Utica Mut. Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court
    • September 13, 1994
    ...that may warrant such extraordinary relief." Squeo, supra, 99 N.J. at 604, 494 A.2d 313. The Court cited Peace River Elec. Corp. v. Choate, 417 So.2d 831, 832 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1982), which stated, "[a]gain, we caution that only extreme cases of disability might warrant such extraordinary re......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT