Peach Parking Corp. v. 346 W. 40TH St., LLC
Decision Date | 03 May 2007 |
Docket Number | 9926N. |
Citation | 2007 NY Slip Op 03859,42 A.D.3d 82,835 N.Y.S.2d 172 |
Parties | PEACH PARKING CORP., Plaintiff, v. 346 WEST 40TH STREET, LLC, Defendant, HERTZ CORPORATION, Respondent, and KINNEY SYSTEM, INC., Appellant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
MAZZARELLI, J.P.
This case arises out of Hertz Corporation's sublease of a garage building located at 346 West 40th Street. Defendant 346 West 40th Street (the Owner) owns the property and the building. Under a February 2, 1978 lease (the Prime Lease), the Owner's predecessor-in-interest leased the property to defendant Kinney System, Inc. (Kinney). The Prime Lease required Kinney to make all structural and nonstructural repairs to the garage. However, an addendum to the Prime Lease limited Kinney's liability for structural repairs to $50,000, absent its gross negligence.
On March 24, 1978, Kinney subleased the property to plaintiff Peach Parking Corp. (Peach). Like the Prime Lease, this sublease contained a provision stating that Peach would "look solely to the [Owner] for the ... making of repairs, alterations or improvements" in excess of $50,000. Thus, similar to the situation with Kinney, Peach's obligations with regard to structural repairs were limited to $50,000.
By an agreement dated November 26, 2001, Peach sub-subleased the garage to defendant Hertz Corporation (Hertz). Like the prior leases, the sublease between Peach and Hertz contained a $50,000 limitation for structural repairs. It provided that "[Hertz] shall have no obligation or liability for any structural repairs to the Premises, except to the extent such structural repairs are necessitated by the grossly negligent or willful acts of [Hertz]."
The Hertz sublease contained an "as is" clause, which stated:
It also provided:
"This Sublease Agreement shall not be effective until Kinney and the [Owner] (i) have given their written consent to the terms and conditions of this Sublease Agreement and (ii) have agreed that so long as [Hertz] shall not be in default under the terms of this Sublease Agreement, in spite of any default of [Peach] or Kinney under the First Sublease or the Prime Lease, this Sublease Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and the possession of the Premises by [Hertz] shall not be disturbed."
The Hertz sublease also contained an integration clause. That clause stated: "[a]ny prior understanding or representation of any kind preceding the date of this Sublease Agreement shall not be binding on either party except to the extent incorporated in this Sublease Agreement."
Prior to entering into the sublease, Thomas Scelba, Hertz's Director of Development, realized the property had problems. He exchanged e-mails with Tom Sabella, Hertz's Staff Vice-President of Real Estate, between July 12 and July 19 regarding both (1) Hertz's responsibilities under the proposed sublease, and (2) the degree of independent investigation of structural integrity of the property to be conducted by Hertz. Notably, in one of these e-mails Scelba stated:
(emphasis supplied).
Despite its knowledge of potential problems, Hertz did not undertake a detailed study of the structural conditions at the garage. Rather, Hertz retained an architectural firm to perform only a "cursory observation of the structural elements" of the property.
Hertz was concerned that the over-landlords would not accept responsibility for structural repairs, especially because Peach would not allow Hertz to communicate with the Owner or Kinney during the leasing negotiations. As a result, in January 2002, Hertz requested that all the parties to all the leases governing the property (the Owner, Kinney, Peach, and Hertz) enter into a "Consent Agreement." In this agreement, all parties affirmed that there were no defaults under any of the existing leases. In March 2002, after each had signed the Consent Agreement, Hertz took possession of the property. In 2004, the Owner served a default notice, stating that Kinney, Peach, and Hertz must correct structural problems at the garage.
Peach commenced this declaratory judgment action against the Owner, Kinney, and Hertz. Peach sought a declaration that it was not obliged to make any repairs, and that it was entitled to reimbursement from the defendants for any repairs that it made. In its answer, Hertz interposed counterclaims against Peach for abatement of rent and constructive eviction. Hertz then moved for leave to amend its answer to interpose various additional claims, including a counterclaim and cross claims for fraud. In the portion of the order appealed, the IAS court granted Hertz leave to assert the fraud claims. Kinney appeals.
It is Kinney's contention that Hertz had all of the relevant evidence available to it, and...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Excel Imaging, P.C.
...fraud claim, corporations may avoid investigating possibly suspicious activities. But see Peach Parking Corp. v. 346 West 40th Street, LLC, 42 A.D.3d 82, 835 N.Y.S.2d 172, 176 (1st Dep't 2007) (holding, in case claiming undisclosed structural issues and defaults in the over-leases of buildi......
-
Gomez–Jimenez v. New York Law Sch.
...or where a variety of factors could have influenced a class member's decision to purchase.”); Peach Parking Corp. v. 356 W. 40th St., LLC, 42 A.D.3d 82, 87, 835 N.Y.S.2d 172 (1st Dept 2007). Measuring reasonableness is done in the context of circumstances. Here, plaintiffs were among the se......
-
Booth v. Ecozone, Inc.
...v. Gandhi, 24 N.Y.3d at 411; Goodwin v. Empire Subway Co., Ltd., 124 A.D.3d 559, 559 (1st Dep't 2015); Peach Parking Corp. v. 346 W. 40th St., LLC, 42 A.D.3d 82, 86 (1st Dep't 2007). The requested amendments do not prejudice Rapid Construction and Renovation since it does not contend that t......
-
Nycha Coney Island Houses v. Ramos
...[1998] ). 4.Davis & Davis v. Morson, 286 A.D.2d 584, 730 N.Y.S.2d 293 (1st Dept. [2001] ); Peach Parking Corp. v. 346 West 40th Street, LLC, 42 A.D.3d 82, 835 N.Y.S.2d 172 (1st Dept. [2007] ). 5.Hospital for Joint Diseases Orthopaedic Institute v. James Katsikis Environmental Contractors, I......