Peel Splint Coal Co v. State
Decision Date | 06 October 1892 |
Citation | 36 W.Va. 802,15 S.E. 1000 |
Court | West Virginia Supreme Court |
Parties | Peel Splint Coal Co. v. State. |
Constitutional Law—"Scrip" Act—Laborers' Wages — Payment in Other than Lawful Money — "Screening" Act — Weighing and Measuring Coal—Indictments Drawn by Defendant—Validity.
1. On the 7th day of March, 1891, the legislature passed an act prohibiting any corporation, company, firm, or person engaged in any trade or business, either directly or indirectly, to issue, sell, give, or deliver, to any person employed by such corporation, company, firm, or person, in payment of wages due such laborer, or as advances for labor not due, any scrip, token, draft, check, or other evidence of indebtedness payable or redeemable otherwise than in lawful money; and, if any such scrip, token, draft, check, or other evidence of indebtedness be so issued, sold, given, or delivered to such laborer, it shall be construed, taken, and held in all courts and places to be a promise to pay the sum specified therein in lawful money by the corporation, company, firm, or person issuing, selling, giving, or delivering the same to the person named therein or to the holder thereof; and providing, further, that a violation of this section on the part of such corporation, etc., shall be a misdemeanor, punishable by fine and imprisonment. And on the 9th day of March, 1891, the legislature passed another act for weighing and measuring coal at the place where mined, before the same is screened, which provided that all coal mined and paid for by weight shall be weighed in the car in which it is removed from the mine, before it is screened, and shall be paid for according to the weight so ascertained, at such price per ton as may be agreed on by such owner or operator and the miners who mined the same; and coal mined and paid for by measure shall be paid for according to the number of bushels marked upon each car in which it is removed from the mine, and before it is screened, and the price paid for each bushel so ascertained shall be such as may be agreed on as aforesaid; and provided, further, that a violation of the act by any corporation, etc., should be a misdemeanor punishable by fine and imprisonment. Held, that neither of these acts is in violation of the constitution of this state, nor of that of the United States, but that both acts, when applied to the facts of this case, are within the scope of legislative authority.
2. The principles of constitutional and statutory construction laid down by this court in Osburn v. Stealey, 5 W. Va. 85; Slack v. Jacob, 8 "W. Va. 612; and State v. Workman, 14 S. E. Rep. 9, 35 W. Va. 367, —approved and reaffirmed.
3. In this state the defendant cannot be permitted to frame the indictment under which he is to be prosecuted for an alleged violation of law.
(Syllabus by the Court.)
Error to circuit court, Kanawha county.
The Peel Splint Coal Company was convicted of a violation of Act March 9, 1891, which provides for the weighing and measuring of coal at the place where mined, before the same is screened, and brings error. Affirmed.
The Peel Splint Coal Company was convicted of a violation of Act March 7, 1891, which prohibits employers from issuing scrip not redeemable in money, in payment of wages due to laborers, and brings error. Affirmed.
The record embraces four indictments, but two of them were not considered, because they were drawn by counsel for defendant, and presented questions In a moot form.
Brown, Jackson & Knight, Mollohan & McClintic, and.St. Clair & Gaines, for plaintiff in error.
J. H. Ferguson, C. C. Watts, and Alfred Caldwell, Atty. Gen., for the State.
Lucas, P. These cases come before us on judgments of the circuit court of Kanawha county pronounced in them in June, 1891, wherein the Peel Splint Coal Company was defendant, and the state of West Virginia was prosecutor, upon indictments under chapters 76 and 82, respectively, of the Acts of the Legislature of 1891. Those acts are as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
McGuire v. Chi., B. & Q. R. Co.
... ... of the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of Iowa. A demurrer to the answer having been overruled, the plaintiff ... for personal injuries to employs, for the screening and weighing of coal as a basis of miner's wages, for compulsory payment of wages at frequent ... 140, 16 Atl. 607, 2 L. R. A. 489, 10 Am. St. Rep. 517;State v. Peel S. C. Co., 36 W. Va. 802, 15 S. E. 1000, 17 L. R. A. 385; Railroad v ... The case of Peel Splint Coal Co v. West Virginia, supra, affirms the validity of a statute ... ...
-
State v. Memorial Gardens Development Corp.
... ... 285, 6 L.R.A. 621; Marlow v. Ringer, 79 W.Va. 568, 91 S.E. 386, L.R.A.1917D 619; Koppers Coal Co. v. Compensation Commissioner, 123 W.Va. 621, 17 S.E.2d 330. Were it not for the protection ... However, a result directly opposite that of the Goodwill case was reached in State v. Peel Splint Coal Co., 36 W.Va. 802, 15 S.E. 1000, 17 L.R.A. 385, Judge [143 W.Va. 209] Lucas announcing ... ...
-
Farley v. Graney
... ... 146 W.Va. 22 ... W. C. FARLEY, etc ... Patrick C. GRANEY, State Road Commissioner, etc ... No. CC857 ... Supreme Court of Appeals of ... Jacob, 8 W.Va. 612, pt. 6 syl. See also State v. Peel Splint Coal Co., 36 W.Va. 802, 15 S.E. 1000, 17 L.R.A. 385. For an ... ...
-
State ex rel. Biafore v. Tomblin
...by the court.' " Morris v. Crown Equip. Corp., 219 W.Va. 347, 355, 633 S.E.2d 292, 300 (2006)(quoting Peel Splint Coal Co. v. State, 36 W.Va. 802, 815, 15 S.E. 1000, 1004 (1892)(citation omitted)). See also Syl. pt. 29, Coal & Coke Ry. Co. v. Conley, 67 W.Va. 129, 67 S.E. 613 (1910)("Courts......