Peeples v. State, 98-873
Decision Date | 09 October 1998 |
Docket Number | No. 98-873,98-873 |
Citation | 719 So.2d 352 |
Parties | 23 Fla. L. Weekly D2291 Wesley L. PEEPLES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Leonard R. Ross, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
Appellant was on probation for attempted lewd or lascivious assault on a child. He was later charged with a violation of that probation by the commission of new substantive offenses. He offered a plea of guilty to the violation of probation, but later sought to withdraw that plea. From an order denying his motion to withdraw his plea, he appeals. We affirm.
At the plea hearing before Judge Nichols, defense counsel advised the court that based on the scoresheet which had been prepared, defendant and the state would recommend to the court a sentence of twelve months incarceration, which would be at the low end of the recommended scale. In the extensive dialogue with defendant before accepting this proffered guilty plea, Judge Nichols was assured by defense counsel and the defendant that no assurances had been given the defendant and that defendant had not been pressured into entering the plea. Judge Nichols then deferred sentencing, observing that a new scoresheet would be required. 1
Appellant later appeared for resentencing, but before a new judge, Judge Parsons, who observed from the new scoresheet that appellant's prior convictions had elevated the recommended guidelines sentence beyond the five year statutory maximum for the substantive offense. Defense counsel then advised the court that he and the state had joined in recommending a twelve month prison sentence. The court acknowledged the advice, but rejected the agreement because of the new scoresheet total. Appellant was then sentenced to five years incarceration. He contends that he was entitled to be sentenced to only twelve months, or be given the right to withdraw his plea. We disagree.
In Goins v. State, 672 So.2d 30 (Fla.1996) the court held: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Atkinson v. State, 98-3496
...Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Goins v. State, 672 So.2d 30 (Fla.1996); Peeples v. State, 719 So.2d 352 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). GRIFFIN, C.J., COBB and GOSHORN, JJ., ...