Pelaez v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor

Decision Date15 January 1980
Citation425 N.Y.S.2d 781,48 N.Y.2d 1021,402 N.E.2d 120
Parties, 402 N.E.2d 120 In the Matter of Alfonso PELAEZ, Respondent, v. WATERFRONT COMMISSION OF NEW YORK HARBOR, Appellant.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
OPINION OF THE COURT MEMORANDUM.

The order appealed from should be reversed and the matter remitted for a determination of the issue raised by the article 78 proceeding.

The Appellate Division erred in concluding that the order of Special Term, which directed that petitioner's suspension should be one with pay until the completion of the disciplinary hearing on the charges against him, was nonfinal. The petition was one aimed only at challenging the payless suspension. Special Term, having ordered petitioner to be paid during the suspension, resolved the entire proceeding and no action other than the purely ministerial one involved in restoring petitioner to the payroll remained to be taken by the commission.

Nor does the fact that the disciplinary hearing was still pending before the commission at the time render the order nonfinal (see, e. g., Matter of Board of Educ. v. Nyquist, 48 N.Y.2d 97, 421 N.Y.S.2d 853, 397 N.E.2d 365; Matter of Jerry v. Board of Educ., 35 N.Y.2d 534, 364 N.Y.S.2d 440, 324 N.E.2d 106; Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, § 31, pp. 127-128). In this regard, we note that any challenge to the outcome of the hearings would have to be brought by way of an independent article 78 proceeding (cf. Matter of Sofair v. State Univ. of N.Y. Upstate Med. Center Coll. of Medicine, 44 N.Y.2d 475, 479, 406 N.Y.S.2d 276, 277, 377 N.E.2d 730).

COOKE, C. J., and JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, with costs, and the matter remitted to the Appellate Division, Second Department, for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum herein.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Garcia v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Health & Mental Hygiene
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 6 Octubre 2016
    ...amendments; thus, it is a final order, appealable as of right (CPLR 5701[a] ; see Matter of Pelaez v. Waterfront Commn. of N.Y. Harbor, 48 N.Y.2d 1021, 1022–1023, 425 N.Y.S.2d 781, 402 N.E.2d 120 [1980]...
  • M & M Partnership v. Sweenor
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 1 Diciembre 1994
    ... ... to this court lies as of right (see, Matter of Pelaez v. Waterfront Comm. of N.Y. Harbor, 48 N.Y.2d 1021, 425 ... ...
  • Board of Ed. of Three Village Central Schools of Towns of Brookhaven and Smithtown, Suffolk County v. Ambach
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 31 Diciembre 1981
    ...5701 an order is nonfinal if the further action mandated is not purely ministerial in nature (Matter of Pelaez v. Waterfront Comm. of N. Y. Harbor, 48 N.Y.2d 1021, 425 N.Y.S.2d 781, 402 N.E.2d 120; Matter of Mid--Is. Hosp. v. Wyman, 15 N.Y.2d 374, 259 N.Y.S.2d 138, 207 N.E.2d 187; Matter of......
  • Pelaez v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 25 Agosto 1980
    ...a final order, and remitted the matter to this court for further proceedings in accordance with its memorandum decision (48 N.Y.2d 1021, 425 N.Y.S.2d 781, 402 N.E.2d 120). Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and matter remitted to Special Term for further proceedi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT