Pellet v. Manufacturers' & Merchants' Ins. Co. of Pittsburg, Pa.

Decision Date19 October 1900
Docket Number663.
Citation104 F. 502
PartiesPELLET et al. v. MANUFACTURERS' & MERCHANTS' INS. CO. OF PITTSBURG, PA.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit

The action in the Circuit Court was an assumpsit by the plaintiffs in error against the defendant in error, to recover damages for alleged breaches by the defendant in error of three certain agreements hereinafter referred to.

The plaintiffs in error, composing the firm of Pellet and Hunter have been, ever since 1885 or 1886, and were at the times of the signing of the said insurance business, conducting and operating in such business a general agency throughout eight or nine states in the north west, and a local agency in Chicago. In the maintenance of said business they have during said period, at their own expense, kept offices in the City of Chicago fully equipped for the transaction of their business, including clerks, stenographers, salaried special agents, and local agents, paid by percentage at various points throughout the field of their general agency, and other employes. In addition to the defendant in error represented by plaintiffs in error under said agreements, the plaintiffs in error represented, as general agents throughout the field of the north west five or six other companies, all of whom maintained their relations with the plaintiffs in error before, and after, the time of the alleged breaches of the said agreements by defendant in error.

The contract between the plaintiffs in error and the defendant in error, dated October 1st, 1897, is in the words and figures following:

'Agreement made this first day of October, A.D. 1897, by and between the Manufacturers' & Merchants' Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa., and R. J. O. Hunter and Clarence S. Pellet, composing the firm of Pellet & Hunter, of Chicago, Illinois, Witnesseth:
'First. The said Manufacturers' and Merchants' Insurance Company does hereby appoint said Pellet & Hunter as General Agents in the territory hereinafter named, with full power and authority to appoint and remove agents and generally to conduct the business of said company under its instructions, within the territory.
'Second. The General Agency hereby created shall cover the entire states of Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, Missouri, Iowa, Nebraska, Ohio, Minnesota and Colorado, and all risks written in or reported through the office of said Pellet & Hunter, at Chicago, Illinois.
'Third. The said Manufacturers' & Merchants Insurance Company shall furnish whensoever requested, full and complete statements, copies of charter and all documents, necessary to enable the said General Agents to enter said company for business in any of the states above named; the time of filing such papers, however, being left at the discretion of the said Pellet & Hunter.
'Fourth. The said Pellet & Hunter are to give all necessary and proper supervision to the business of said Company in their territory, and in person or by competent representatives to make thorough inspection from time to time of the risk reported to them from the various agents;-- and shall forward to said Manufacturers' & Merchants' Insurance Company of Pittsburg, Pa., with reasonable promptness, copies of all daily reports and endorsements received from agents and originals of their own business (the originals from agents to be kept in the office of Pellet & Hunter) and shall forward regularly-- not later than the 27th day of each month- a detailed statement of the account of the business of such agency for the preceding month, and they shall be responsible for all premiums collected by agents appointed by them, and they shall make remittance to the said Company of the balance shown by such monthly statement to be due from them, not later than sixty days after the month for which such account is made up.
'Fifth. The said Pellet & Hunter shall retain during the existence of this contract a commission of thirty-three and one-third per cent. (33 1/3%) on all net gross business reported through or by their office (by net gross business is meant premiums, less return premiums and all reductions by re-insurance) and in consideration of the sum so retained, they shall pay and bear all expense for supervision and inspection commissions to agents; all state, county and city taxes; all fees and charges of all state or municipal departments; adjustment expenses; and all other expenses and charges whatsoever, except only legal expenses in cases of litigation and the necessary blanks and forms for the proper carrying on of the business; and the balance, if any, of the said 33 1/3% shall be retained by them as full compensation for their services as such General Agents. The said forms and blanks to be furnished at the expense of the said Manufacturers' & Merchants' Insurance Company-- provided, however, that the said Pellet & Hunter shall be further entitled to a contingent commission of ten per cent (10%) on the net profits derived by the Company from their General Agency during the year ending September 30th, 1898, and each succeeding year, to be ascertained and paid after settlement of losses incurred during the year and after deducting the matters pertaining to said General Agency, provided further, that if there shall be any unsettled losses by reason of dispute or litigation, such losses shall be treated as settled at the amount claimed by the assured, and so figured in determining the amount of contingent commission due said Pellet & Hunter and any difference in final settlement of said disputed or contested losses shall be added to or deducted from the losses of the succeeding year.
'Sixth. This contract shall continue for the term of three (3) years from the 30th day of September, A.D. 1897, provided however, that if at the expiration of the first year of its continuance, either party may desire to revoke or annul this contract, they shall have the right so to do, by giving to the other three months' written notice of their election so to do, and at the expiration of the date fixed in such notice to be given, however, within ten (10) days after the expiration of the first year, or on this contract shall again continue in full for a year, subject to a like revocation (in the manner as above provided) at the end of the second year.'

A contract known as the 'Five Companies Agreement,' dated March 22nd, 1897, and the supplement thereto, executed March 19th, 1898, were substantially the same as the foregoing, except that the commission was fixed at thirty-three per centum instead of thirty-three and one-third per centum, and that they were to continue for three years from January 1st, 1897.

April 4th, 1899, the following agreement was entered into between the defendant in error and the Fidelity Insurance Company of Baltimore:

'That for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter expressed and set forth the said parties hereto have covenanted and agreed as follows, that is to say:
'First: Said Fidelity Company hereby reinsures and assumes at and from the hour of twelve o'clock noon (standard time) of Saturday, the first day of April, in the year eighteen and ninety-nine (1899), all outstanding policies and risks of said Manufacturers' Company, for insurance against loss or damage by fire or lightning on any property located in any part of the United States of America or Canada, and the said Fidelity Company hereby assumes any and all liabilities under any and all outstanding policies or risks heretofore written by said Manufacturers' Company and for any and all policies or risks which may be written or undertaken by said Manufacturers' Company in pursuance of clause five of this contract.
'Second: In consideration of such reinsurance said Manufacturers' Company agrees to pay to said Fidelity Company in the manner and at the time hereinafter specified, the full unearned gross pro rata premium on all policies in force as of April 1st, 1899, less sixty (60) per cent thereof, which said deduction is to cover all commissions and expenses incurred by by said Manufacturers' Company in connection with said policies or risks.
'Third: Within fifteen days after the date of this agreement or contract of re-insurance, said Manufacturers' Company agrees to make a cash payment of and to pay forty thousand dollars to the said Fidelity Company on account of said unearned gross pro rata premiums provided to be paid by said Manufacturers' Company to said Fidelity Company in the next preceding clause of this agreement and the said Manufacturers' Company hereby agrees to pay the balance of said entire amount of such unearned gross pro rata premiums to the said Fidelity Company on the completion of the computation of the total amount thereof, provided said payment shall be made by said Manufacturers' Company not later than the first day of May, 1899.
'Fourth: And said Manufacturers' Company hereby agrees and undertakes to furnish to said Fidelity Company complete schedules or bordereaux of all outstanding policies of said Manufacturers' Company, on forms to be supplied by said Fidelity Company, which schedules or bordereaux shall be completed and furnished and delivered to said Fidelity Company on or before the first day of May, 1899, and it is hereby expressly and mutually understood and agreed between the parties thereto that said schedules or bordereaux shall be complete and accurate in all particulars, according to said form, and that said Fidelity Company shall not assume or be liable under any Policy or Policies omitted from or not set forth on said schedules or bordereaux nor shall said Fidelity Company be liable under any policy for or in any greater amount or for any longer period or term than may be set forth on said schedules or
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
18 cases
  • Paisley v. Lucas
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • September 18, 1940
    ... ... Medley, 163 Mo.App. 555; Zinc & Lead Co. v. Ins. Co., 152 Mo.App. 342; Burman v ... Bezeau, 85 S.W.2d ... Co. v. Loss, 170 ... S.W. 1062; Merchants Life Ins. Co. v. Griswold, 212 ... S.W. 807; Stowell v ... Imperial Life Ins ... Co., 58 F. 843; Pellet v. Mfgrs. & Merchants Ins ... Co., 104 F. 502; Davis v ... ...
  • Central States Power & Light Corp. v. United States Zinc Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • August 1, 1932
    ...There are two cases, decided by courts of high authority, that consider a situation quite similar. In Pellet v. Manufacturers' & Merchants' Ins. Co. (C. C. A. 7) 104 F. 502, and in English & Scottish Marine Ins. Co., 5 Ch. App. 737, it appeared that the insurance company defendant had in ea......
  • Emerson v. Pacific Coast & Norway Packing Company
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • September 22, 1905
    ... ... operating between the producers or manufacturers and the ... wholesale grocers. They had offices at various ... Ames-Brooks Co. v. Aetna ... Ins. Co., 83 Minn. 346, 86 N.W. 344; Fontaine v ... Baxley, ... Co., 5 Ch. App. 737; ... Pellet v. Manufacturers' & Merchants' Ins ... Co., 104 F. 502, ... Beaudry, 68 Mich. 312, 36 N.W. 88; Pittsburg ... [96 Minn. 8] v. Ashton, 184 Pa. St. 36, 39 A. 223; ... ...
  • Moore v. Security Trust & Life Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • March 23, 1909
    ... ... In September, ... 1906, the defendant made a contract with the Pittsburg Life & ... Trust Company whereby it turned over to that company all its ... Ins. Co., 5 Ch. App. 737; Pellet v ... Manufacturers' & Merchants' Ins. Co., 104 F ... 502, 509, 511, ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT