Pelton v. State, WD
Decision Date | 07 August 1990 |
Docket Number | No. WD,WD |
Citation | 794 S.W.2d 301 |
Parties | James O. PELTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent. 42420. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
James O. Pelton, Cameron, pro se.
Philip M. Koppe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kansas City, for respondent.
Before LOWENSTEIN, P.J., and CLARK and FENNER, JJ.
Movant, James O. Pelton, appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. On May 11, 1988, Pelton plead guilty to second degree robbery, § 569.030, RSMo 1986. He received a suspended imposition of sentence and was placed on five years probation. On March 14, 1989, a hearing was held, and Pelton's probation was revoked as a result of convictions for driving while intoxicated and driving without a license, violations of the Excelsior Springs municipal code.
Pelton filed his motion for post-conviction relief on March 29, 1989. Counsel was appointed April 18, and motion counsel filed for an extension of time on May 22, 1989. An extension was granted, and an amended motion was filed June 19, 1989. 1 No evidentiary hearing was held, and the motion court issued findings of fact and conclusions of law in accordance with Rule 24.035(i), denying the motion on August 11, 1989.
Pelton had originally been charged with conspiracy to commit robbery. § 564.016, RSMo 1986. Just before the guilty plea hearing, the state filed an amended information charging Pelton with second degree robbery. In regard to the amended information, trial counsel made the following statement:
(emphasis added).
The facts, set forth by Pelton at the hearing indicated that on January 6, 1987, he and Silva went to Mrs. Wahl's house to cut wood. Silva talked to Mrs. Wahl out in front of the house about cutting wood, and Pelton stayed in the truck. Mrs. Wahl went into the house, and Silva followed her. A few minutes later, Silva returned to the truck and told Pelton that they couldn't cut any wood. As they were driving down the highway, Silva pulled Mrs. Wahl's purse out from under his coat and told Pelton that he had shot Mrs. Wahl in order to take her purse, and got $100. Pelton drove home and watched, as Silva buried the purse in Pelton's back yard. Pelton also hid the gun Silva had used in his attic. Silva gave Pelton twenty dollars as his share of the money taken from Mrs. Wahl.
After Pelton told his story, trial counsel said, "That's what he told me, Judge." The prosecutor also stated:
Pelton's guilty plea petition states facts not inconsistent with those above, and ends with, "I ... aided and abedded [sic] Fred Silvas commit this crime."
Remanded for an evidentiary hearing.
Pelton presents four points for review: (1) the record of his guilty plea "has no lawful conclusion;" (2) an additional term was added to his probation, thus changing the terms of his plea bargain; (3) he was irrational and did not comprehend the consequences of the plea proceedings; and (4) the motion court erred in denying a hearing and making insufficient findings. Because the final point is dispositive, it alone shall be addressed.
First, a movant must request a hearing before one will be considered. See Miller v. State, 786 S.W.2d 189, 190 (Mo.App.1990). Although the state in its brief argues that no hearing was requested, Pelton did in fact request a hearing in his pro se motion. But to be entitled to an evidentiary hearing, a movant must also allege facts, not refuted by the record, which if true would warrant relief. Warren v. State, 740 S.W.2d 251, 252 (Mo.App.1987). Failure to allege such facts is fatal to a motion seeking post-conviction relief, and warrants denial of the motion without an evidentiary hearing. Bolder v. State, 769 S.W.2d 84, 87 (Mo. banc 1989).
Pelton plead guilty to the charge. Upon a plea of guilty, the effectiveness of counsel is relevant only to the extent that it affects the voluntariness of the plea. Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bishop v. State, 21999
...(1970)). "[T]he effectiveness of counsel is relevant only to the extent that it affects the voluntariness of the plea." Pelton v. State, 794 S.W.2d 301, 303 (Mo.App.1990). To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, the claimant must show by a preponderance of the evidence t......
-
Masden v. State, WD59618
...the murder, the testimony, if found credible, would have provided him with a defense to the charged crimes. See Pelton v. State, 794 S.W.2d 301, 303 (Mo. App. W.D. 1990) (holding that an individual cannot be held criminally liable for another's acts merely because he or she aided the indivi......
-
Perkins v. State, WD80745
...State, 192 S.W.3d 746, 749 n.4 (Mo. App. S.D. 2006); State v. Leisure, 810 S.W.2d 560, 575 (Mo. App. E.D. 1991); Pelton v. State, 794 S.W.2d 301, 302 n.1 (Mo. App. W.D. 1990). Based on Clemmons, the motion court had no authority to grant Perkins's October 3, 2016 motion seeking an extension......
-
Perkins v. State
..., 192 S.W.3d 746, 749 n.4 (Mo. App. S.D. 2006) ; State v. Leisure , 810 S.W.2d 560, 575 (Mo. App. E.D. 1991) ; Pelton v. State , 794 S.W.2d 301, 302 n.1 (Mo. App. W.D. 1990). Under Clemmons , the motion court had no authority to grant Perkins's October 3, 2016 motion for an extension of tim......