Pendleton v. Hubbard
Decision Date | 30 November 1910 |
Citation | 132 S.W. 696,231 Mo. 314 |
Parties | PENDLETON et al. v. HUBBARD et al. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Lafayette County; Sam Davis, Judge.
Action by Catherine H. Pendleton and others against Joseph R. Hubbard and others. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal. Affirmed.
Geo. H. English and M. D. Trefren, for appellants. Cook & Gossett, for respondents.
This case is here upon the record proper. As to the title to the lands involved it deals with facts and records perfectly familiar to this court. Hubbard v. Slavens, 218 Mo. 598, 117 S. W. 1104. Plaintiffs are the widow and heirs at law of William K. Pendleton, and Dwight L. Pendleton, besides suing as an heir, further sues as a trustee under his father's will. It is alleged that, by reason of the will, the legal title is vested in the trustee. By the petition it is charged that William K. Pendleton in his lifetime was seised of an indefeasible estate in fee to a certain 50 acres of land, now a part of Kansas City, Mo., describing the same; that during his lifetime the said William K. Pendleton sold off portions of this tract and gave warranty deeds thereto; that since his death his trustee, Dwight L., has conveyed other portions and given warranty deeds thereto. A part yet remains unconveyed. The petition is one which seeks to quiet title to the whole fifty acres, and in great length recites in detail all of the alleged facts. It recites each and every conveyance from the deed by which Chester Hubbard acquired title. Joseph R. Hubbard and Ellen L. Jeffries are alleged to be the only heirs at law of Chester Hubbard, deceased.
The prayer of the petition in a way is a résumé of many of the pleaded facts, and reads: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Dinkelman v. Hovekamp
... ... Mo. 321; Hecker v. Bleisch, 37 S.W.2d 447; ... Gillham v. Ry. Co., 282 Mo. 130; State ex rel ... v. Lumber Co., 260 Mo. 276; Pendleton v ... Hubbard, 231 Mo. 314. (2) The burden was on appellants ... to establish there was no divorce, they have not sustained ... it. It will be ... ...
-
Dinkelman v. Hovekamp
...131 Mo. 321; Hecker v. Bleisch, 37 S.W. (2d) 447; Gillham v. Ry. Co., 282 Mo. 130; State ex rel. v. Lumber Co., 260 Mo. 276; Pendleton v. Hubbard, 231 Mo. 314. (2) The burden was on appellants to establish there was no divorce, they have not sustained it. It will be presumed in favor of the......
- Pendleton v. Hubbard