Penland v. Golden
| Decision Date | 05 November 1951 |
| Citation | 236 P.2d 823,107 Cal.App.2d 256 |
| Court | California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
| Parties | PENLAND v. GOLDEN et al. Civ. 18357. |
Elledge R. Penland, in pro. per.
Major & Tenner, by Jack Tenner, Los Angeles, for respondents.
This is an appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to a complaint with leave to amend. As an appeal does not lie from such an order, but only from a judgment entered thereon we are without jurisdiction to review the case on its merits. Cornic v. Stewart, 179 Cal. 242, 176 P. 164. Accordingly, we are required on our own motion to dismiss the appeal.
Appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
- Jeffers v. Screen Extras Guild
-
Carley v. City of Santa Rosa
...to entertain a purported appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, with or without leave to amend. Penland v. Golden, 107 Cal.App.2d 256, 236 P.2d 823; Cole v. Rush, 40 Cal.2d 178, 252 P.2d 1. See also 2 Witkins, Pleading and Practice Upon the oral argument appellants con......