Pensacola Telegraph Company v. Western Union Telegraph Company
Decision Date | 01 October 1877 |
Citation | 96 U.S. 1,24 L.Ed. 708 |
Parties | PENSACOLA TELEGRAPH COMPANY v. WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Florida.
In 1859, an association of persons, known as the Pensacola Telegraph Company, erected a line of electric telegraph upon the right of way of the Alabama and Florida railroad, from Pensacola, in Florida, to Pollard, in Alabama, about six miles north of the Florida line. The company operated the whole line until 1862, when, upon the evacuation of Pensacola by the Confederate forces, the wire was taken down for twenty-three miles, and Cooper's Station made the southern terminus. In 1864, the whole was abandoned, as the section of the country in which it was situated had fallen into the possession of the United States troops.
On the 1st of December, 1865, the stockholders met; and it appearing that the assets of the company were insufficient to rebuild the line, a new association was formed for that purpose, with the old name, and new stock to the amount of $5,000 subscribed. A resolution was adopted by the new company to purchase the property of the old, at a valuation put upon it in a report submitted to the meeting, and a new board of directors was elected.
A meeting of the directors was held on the 2d of January, 1866, at which the president reported the completion of the line to Pensacola, and a resolution was adopted, authorizing the purchase of wire for its extension to the navy-yard. The attorneys of the company were also instructed to prepare a draft of a charter, to be presented to the legislature for enactment.
On the 24th of July, 1866, Congress passed the following act: —
'AN ACT to aid in the construction of telegraph lines, and to secure to the government the use of the same for postal, military, and other purposes.
' .
' .
' . 14 Stat. 221; Rev. Stat., sect. 5263 et seq.
All railroads in the United States are by law post-roads. Rev. Stat., sect. 3964; 17 Stat. 308, sect. 201.
On the 11th of December, 1866, the legislature of Florida passed an act incorporating the Pensacola Telegraph Company, and granting it 'the sole and exclusive privilege and right of establishing and maintaining lines of electric telegraph in the counties of Escambia and Santa Rosa, either from different points within said counties, or connecting with lines coming into said counties, or either of them, from any point in this [Florida] or any other State.' The capital stock was fixed at $5,000, with the privilege of increasing it to such an amount as might be considered necessary. The company was authorized to locate and construct its lines within the counties named, 'along and upon any public road or highway, or across any water, or upon any railroad or private property for which permission shall first have been obtained from the proprietors thereof.' In this act all the stockholders of the new association which had rebuilt the line were named as corporators. No meeting of the directors was held until Jan. 2, 1868, when the secretary was instructed to notify the stockholders 'that the charter drawn up by Messrs. Campbell & Perry, attorneys, as per order of board, Jan. 2, 1866,' had been passed.
On the 5th of June, 1867, the directors of the defendant, the Western Union Telegraph Company, a New York corporation, passed the following resolution, which was duly filed with the Postmaster-General:——
'Resolved, that this company does hereby accept the provisions of the act of Congress, entitled 'An Act to aid in the construction of telegraph lines, and to secure to the government the use of the same for postal, military, and other purposes,' approved July 24, 1866, with all the powers, privileges, restrictions, and obligations conferred and required thereby; and that the secretary be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to file this resolution with the Postmaster-General of the United States, duly attested by the signature of the acting president of the company and the seal of the corporation, in compliance with the fourth section of said act of Congress.'
In 1872, the property of the Alabama and Florida Railroad Company, including its right of way and railroad, was transferred to the Pensacola and Louisville Railroad Company; and on the 14th of February, 1873, the legislature of Florida passed an act, which, as amended Feb. 18, 1874, authorized the last-named company 'to construct, maintain, and operate a telegraph line from the Bay of Pensacola along the line of the said (its) road as now located, or as it may hereafter be located, and along connecting roads in said county to the boundary lines of the State of Alabama, and the said lines may connect and be consolidated with other telegraph companies within or without the State, and said company may pledge, mortgage, lease, sell, assign, and convey the property appertaining to the said telegraph lines, and the rights, privileges, and franchises conferred by this act, with full power in such assignees to construct, own, and operate such telegraph lines, and enjoy all the privileges, rights, and franchises conferred by this act; but in such case the said railroad company shall be responsible for the proper performance of the duties and obligations imposed by this act.'
This was within the territory embraced by the exclusive grant to the Pensacola Telegraph Company.
On the 24th of June, 1874, the Pensacola and Louisville Railroad Company granted to the Western Union Telegraph Company the right to erect a telegraph line upon its right of way, and also the rights and privileges conferred by the acts of February, 1873 and 1874. The Western Union Company immediately commenced the erection of the line; but before its completion, to wit, July 27, 1874, the bill in this case was filed by the Pensacola Telegraph Company to enjoin the work and the use of the line, on account of the alleged exclusive right of that company under its charter. Upon the hearing, a decree was passed dismissing the bill, and this appeal was taken.
Mr. Charles W. Jones, for the appellant.
Except when prohibited or restricted by the provisions of the State Constitution, the legislature can grant exclusive privileges and franchises within its own jurisdiction. Cooley, Const. Lim. 281; Gibbons v. Ogden, 9 Wheat. 1; West River Bridge Co. v. Dix et al., 6 How. 507; S. C. 16 Vt. 446; The Binghamton Bridge, 3 Wall. 51; Shorter v. Smith, 9 Ga. 529; The Proprietors of the Piscataqua Bridge v. The New Hampshire Bridge et al., 7 N. H. 35; Boston Water Power Co. v. Boston & Lowell Railroad Corporation et al., 23 Pick. (Mass.) 360; Boston & Lowell Railroad Corporation v. Salem & Lowell Railroad Co. et al., 2 Gray (Mass.), 1; California Telegraph Co. v. The Atlantic Telegraph Co., 22 Cal. 398; Hazen et al. v. The Union Bank of Tennessee, 1 Sneed (Tenn.), 115; The People v. Bowen, 30 Barb. (N. Y.) 24; Livingston v. Van Ingen et al., 9 Johns. (N. Y.) 506; Ogden v. Gibbons, 4 Johns. (N. Y.) Ch. 150.
In Florida there were no such restrictions or prohibitions. On the contrary, by the express terms of sect. 3, art. 15, of her Constitution, the special statute of Dec. 11, 1866, incorporating the appellant and granting the exclusive privileges which are asserted in this suit,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Crescent Cotton Oil Co. v. State ex rel. Collins
... ... -General, against the Crescent Cotton Oil Company ... From a judgment for relator, defendant ... 274; ... Pensacola Telegraph Company v. Western Union Telegraph ... ...
-
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Lee
... ... Action ... by Robert E. Lee against the Western Union Telegraph Company ... Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Reversed and ... remanded ... another constitute a portion of commerce itself ... Pensacola Telegraph Co. v. Western Union Tel. Co., ... 96 U.S. 1, 24 L.Ed. 708; Western Union Tel. Co. v ... ...
-
In re Watson
... ... telegraph company, which is graduated according to the ... Chicago, etc., ... Co. 94 U.S. 164; Pensacola T. Co. v. Western U.T. Co. 96 U.S ... 1; New ... Pennsylvania, 21 Wall ... [ I3 ] Amer. Union Express Co. v. St. Joseph, ... 66 Mo. 675 ... ...
-
Shepard v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.
... ... to the Northern Pacific Company an annual net income of only ... 2.909 per ... 328, 28 Sup.Ct. 121, 52 L.Ed ... 230; Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Kansas, 216 U.S ... 1, ... Wall. 232, 275, 280, 21 L.Ed. 146; Pensacola Telegraph ... Co. v. Western Union Telegraph ... ...
-
Mcculloch v. Maryland and the Incoherence of Enumerationism
...SCHWARTZ, supra note 4, at 99–101. 159. Ex parte Siebold, 100 U.S. 371, 394–95 (1880); accord Pensacola Tel. Co. v. Western Union Tel. Co., 96 U.S. 1, 11 (1878) (U.S. government “operates upon every foot of territory under its jurisdiction.”). 2021] MCCULLOCH AND THE INCOHERENCE OF ENUMERAT......
-
More on the Origins of the Fuller Court's Jurisprudence: Reexamining the Scope of Federal Power Over Commerce and Manufacturing in Nineteenth-Century Constitutional Law
...at an elevator whichwas located at a place where it was no longer necessary to stop 9 And in Pensacola Telegraph Company v. Western Union, 96 U.S. 1 (1878), the Court ruled interstate telegraph lines are instrumentalities of interstate commerce sincethey are used to transport information an......
-
Locating the boundaries: the scope of Congress's power to regulate Commerce.
...(162.) See Id. at 417. (163.) United States v. Morrison, 529 U.S. 598, 617 (2000). (164.) See Pensacola Tel. Co. v. W. Union Tel. Co., 96 U.S. 1, 9 (165.) There may be a separate and additional justification for rejecting the federal government's intrusion into States' traditional law enfor......