Pentecostal Pilgrims v. Connor

Decision Date19 January 2010
Docket NumberNo. COA09-398.,COA09-398.
Citation688 S.E.2d 81
PartiesPENTECOSTAL PILGRIMS AND STRANGERS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. Mark E. CONNOR, Fonville Morisey Realty, Inc., and Mount Peace Baptist Church, Defendants.
CourtNorth Carolina Court of Appeals

The Shanahan Law Group, PLLC, by Kieran Shanahan, Raleigh, for plaintiff appellant.

Wardell & Associates, PLLC, by Bryan E. Wardell, Raleigh, for Mount Peace Baptist Church defendant appellee.

HUNTER, JR., ROBERT N., Judge.

Plaintiff, Pentecostal Pilgrims and Strangers Corporation ("Pentecostal Pilgrims"), appeals from an order allowing the motion to dismiss of defendant Mount Peace Baptist Church ("Mount Peace"), for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to North Carolina Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Neither party has addressed the jurisdictional threshold question of whether this appeal is interlocutory and, if so, nonetheless affects a substantial right. "`[I]t is well established in this jurisdiction that if an appealing party has no right of appeal, an appellate court on its own motion should dismiss the appeal even though the question of appealability has not been raised by the parties themselves.'" Yordy v. N.C. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., 149 N.C.App. 230, 230-31, 560 S.E.2d 384, 384 (2002) (quoting Bailey v. Gooding, 301 N.C. 205, 208, 270 S.E.2d 431, 433 (1980)). For the reasons set forth below, we dismiss this appeal as interlocutory.

I. Factual Background

Pentecostal Pilgrims alleged the following in its complaint: In January 1996, Pentecostal Pilgrims purchased a 4.73-acre tract of commercial real estate ("the property"), located in Raleigh, North Carolina, for $255,000.00. The property was purchased through a deed of trust securing a promissory note in favor of Wachovia Bank of North Carolina ("Wachovia Bank"). In June 2006, Pentecostal Pilgrims was having financial difficulty making the payment and decided to sell the property.

Pentecostal Pilgrims consulted with Fonville Morisey Realty, Inc. ("Fonville Morisey") real estate agent Mark E. Connor ("Connor") on the marketing of the property. Pentecostal Pilgrims' pastor, Bishop Vernon Jones ("Bishop Jones"), and church secretary, Shelby S. Taylor ("Taylor"), shared confidential information about Pentecostal Pilgrims' finances and goals with Connor.

On or about 12 June 2006, Pentecostal Pilgrims signed Fonville Morisey's "Exclusive Right to Sell Listing Agreement" ("Listing Agreement"). The Listing Agreement showed the sales price as $1,500,000.00. Taylor was designated to communicate with Connor on behalf of Pentecostal Pilgrims; she reported their negotiations to Bishop Jones. Pentecostal Pilgrims alleges that, under the Listing Agreement, Connor had a duty to inform it of potential buyers, as well as show and market the property to those purchasers.

On or about 14 June 2006, Pentecostal Pilgrims received a certified demand letter from Wachovia Bank indicating that the property would be sold through a foreclosure auction sale before 12 July 2006. The next day, Pentecostal Pilgrims called Connor to inform him that the property was in foreclosure and would be sold; therefore, the property needed to be sold before the foreclosure date.

Pentecostal Pilgrims alleges that Connor waited one to two weeks after the parties signed the Listing Agreement to place the "For Sale" sign on the property and waited until 16 June 2006 to enter the property into the Multiple Listing Service database. On or about 19 June 2006, Taylor, at Connor's request, signed a Dual Agency Addendum on behalf of Pentecostal Pilgrims. The Dual Agency Addendum did not identify Mount Peace as Connor's second client. Moreover, Connor asked Taylor to "back date" the Addendum to 12 June 2006, the date of the original Exclusive Right to Sell Listing Agreement. Pentecostal Pilgrims alleges that Connor secured the dual agency so that he could also represent Mount Peace where Connor was a member and President of the Board of Trustees.

On 19 June 2006, Connor told Pentecostal Pilgrims that Mount Peace was interested in purchasing the property and that he knew of a "back-up buyer" who could pay cash if Mount Peace could not buy the property. Five potential buyers tried to contact Connor to inquire about the property prior to the foreclosure sale. Connor did not show the property to any prospective buyers. Moreover, individuals advised Pentecostal Pilgrims that they contacted Connor about viewing and purchasing the property; however, neither Connor nor Fonville Morisey returned the individual's phone calls or met them to view the property.

On 30 June 2006, Connor notified Pentecostal Pilgrims about Mount Peace's offer to purchase the property for $800,000.00. This was the first offer Connor conveyed to Pentecostal Pilgrims after being hired. Pentecostal Pilgrims accepted the offer and requested a written Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Real Property. Connor told Taylor that these documents would arrive between 5-7 July 2006. Pentecostal Pilgrims alleges that it did not hear from Connor for several days.

On 7 July 2006, Pentecostal Pilgrims notified Wachovia Bank about the upcoming sale of the property. Herb Utter ("Utter"), the beneficiary of the Trust for which Wachovia held the note, allowed Pentecostal Pilgrims to bring the note current and postpone foreclosure proceedings if Pentecostal Pilgrims provided him the Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Real Property on 10 July 2006, and by the morning of 11 July 2006. On 8 July 2006, Taylor emailed Connor on behalf of Pentecostal Pilgrims noting the conversation with Utter about postponing the foreclosure proceedings. Connor did not respond to Taylor's email. Taylor demanded to know who the "back-up buyer" was, but Connor did not disclose the information. Connor did not supply the Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Real Property and missed the deadline that Utter imposed.

On 10 July 2006, Pentecostal Pilgrims received an email from Connor indicating that Mount Peace reduced its offer to $525,000.00. When Taylor called Connor to protest this offer, Connor said that he considered it to be a fair offer. Connor missed two appointments with Pentecostal Pilgrims on 10 July 2006, but finally arrived at 4:45 p.m. with the Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Real Property. On 12 July 2006, Pentecostal Pilgrims, Connor and Stephany Hand ("Hand"), attorney for Mount Peace, met with officers from Wachovia Bank in an attempt to postpone foreclosure proceedings. At this time Utter, via telephone conference, gave Wachovia instructions to foreclose on the property. Connor and Hand then began asking questions about bidding on the property at the foreclosure sale.

On 14 July 2006, Connor personally began to submit and sign initial bids and subsequent upset bids on behalf of Mount Peace. On 11 October 2006, Connor submitted and signed a successful upset bid for $485,743.28. Mount Peace purchased the property through the foreclosure sale and a Final Report and Account of Foreclosure Sale was filed on 16 January 2007. In January 2007, Mount Peace began occupying the property.

On 21 September 2007, Mount Peace filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. On 10 September 2008, the trial court granted the motion to dismiss Pentecostal...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Miller v. E. Band Cherokee Indians
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • January 18, 2022
    ...Discussion¶ 9 As a preliminary matter, we note that Plaintiff's appeal is interlocutory. See Pentecostal Pilgrims & Strangers Corp. v. Connor , 202 N.C. App. 128, 131, 688 S.E.2d 81, 83 (2010) (citation omitted). "A judgment is either interlocutory or the final determination of the rights o......
  • Mosqueda v. Mosqueda
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • January 17, 2012
    ...thus adjudicating the rights and liabilities of fewer than all the parties, is interlocutory. Pentecostal Pilgrims & Strangers Corp. v. Connor, 202 N.C.App. 128, 132, 688 S.E.2d 81, 84 (2010). “There are only two means by which an interlocutory order may be appealed: (1) if the order is fin......
  • Bohn v. Black
    • United States
    • Superior Court of North Carolina
    • May 16, 2018
    ...April 17 Order dealt solely with enforcing the parties' agreed-to discovery deadlines and did not dispose of any claim as to any party. See id.; see also Sharpe v. Worland, 351 N.C. 159, 162, S.E.2d 577, 579 (1999) ("[T]he trial court's discovery order is interlocutory because it does not d......
  • Plasman v. Decca Furniture (USA), Inc., 12 CVS 2832
    • United States
    • Superior Court of North Carolina
    • October 26, 2015
    ...the pendency of the appeal is not a final judgment because it did not dispose of the case. See Pentecostal Pilgrims & Strangers Corp. v. Connor, 202 N.C.App. 128, 132, 688 S.E.2d 81, 83–84 (2010) (quoting Veazey v. Durham, 231 N.C. 357, 361, 57 S.E.2d 377, 381 (1950)) ("A final judgment is ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT