People ex rel. Ortenberg v. Bales
| Decision Date | 16 April 1929 |
| Citation | 250 N.Y. 598,166 N.E. 339 |
| Parties | PEOPLE of the State of New York ex rel. Samuel ORTENBERG et al., Respondents, v. Charles F. BALES, Chief Inspector and Acting Superintendent of the Building Department, Borough of Queens, City of New York, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department (224 App. Div. 87, 229 N. Y. S. 550), entered July 7, 1928, which reversed an order of Special Term denying an application for a peremptory order of mandamus to compel the defendant to withdraw his revocation of a permit for the erection of a business building on premises which subsequently to the issue of such permit were zoned for residential purposes only, and granted said application.
George P. Nicholson, Corp. Counsel, of New York City (Willard S. Allen, J. Joseph Lilly, and Robert J. Culhane, all of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
James E. Doherty, of New York City, for respondent.
Order affirmed, with costs.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Reichenbach v. Windward at Southampton
... ... v. Town Board of Vestal, supra; Ortenberg v. Bales, 224 App.Div. 87, 229 N.Y.S. 550, aff'd 250 N.Y. 598, 166 N.E ... the expenses must not only be substantial in and of themselves (see People v. Miller, 304 N.Y. 105, 106 N.E.2d 34; Poczatek v. Zoning Board of ... 401, aff'd 253 App.Div. 764, 300 N.Y.S. 1152; People ex rel. Sweet v. Board of Supervisors, 101 App.Div. 327, 91 N.Y.S. 948; Russell ... ...
-
Harbison v. City of Buffalo
...of a building, a zoning ordinance may not deprive the owner of the 'vested right' to complete the structure (People ex rel. Ortenberg v. Bales, 250 N.Y. 598, 166 N.E. 339; see City of Buffalo v. Chadeayne, 134 N.Y. 163, 165, 31 N.E. 443). So, where the owner already has structures on the pr......
-
Town of Orangetown v. Magee
...development (see, Matter of Putnam Armonk v. Town of Southeast, 52 A.D.2d 10, 14-15, 382 N.Y.S.2d 538; see also, People ex rel. Ortenberg v. Bales, 250 N.Y. 598, 166 N.E. 339, aff'g 224 App.Div. 87, 229 N.Y.S. 550; City of Buffalo v. Chadeayne, 134 N.Y. 163, 165, 31 N.E. 443, 443-44; Matter......
-
Women's Christian Ass'n of Kansas City v. Brown
... ... 102nd St. Corp. v. Murdock, 285 N.Y. 298, 34 N.E.2d ... 329; People v. Bales, 229 N.Y.S. 550, affirmed 250 ... N.Y. 598, 166 N.E. 339; City ... St. Louis, 341 Mo. 689, ... 108 S.W.2d 143; State of Washington ex rel. v ... Roberge, 278 U.S. 116, 73 L.Ed. 210, 49 S.Ct. 50, 86 ... A.L.R ... ...