People ex rel. City of Denver v. Union P. Ry. Co.
Decision Date | 18 June 1894 |
Citation | 20 Colo. 186,37 P. 610 |
Parties | PEOPLE ex rel. CITY OF DENVER v. UNION PAC. RY. CO. SAME v. UNION PAC., D. & G. RY. CO. SAME v. BURLINGTON & C. RY. CO. SAME v. DENVER & R. G. RY. CO. |
Court | Colorado Supreme Court |
Error to district court, Arapahoe county.
Petitions for writs of mandamus by the people of the state of Colorado on the relation of the city of Denver, against the Union Pacific, Denver & Gulf Railway Company, the Union Pacific Railway Company, the Burlington & Colorado Railway Company and the Denver & Rio Grande Railway Company. The proceedings were dismissed, and petitioner brings error. Reversed.
Mandamus to compel certain railroad corporations to construct a viaduct over their tracks on Nineteenth street, in the city of Denver. In the district court the proceedings were dismissed for insufficiency of the petitions. Petitioner brings error. Concurrent actions were brought by the city against each railroad company having tracks intersecting or extending along Nineteenth street, in the city of Denver. The facts are identical in each case, and in this court the actions were consolidated, under No. 2,884, for the purpose of argument and determination. The actions were all brought to enforce the provisions of the following ordinance of the city of Denver:
Authority to pass the foregoing ordinance is claimed under the following provisions of the charter of the city of Denver, to be found on page 127 of the Acts of 1889:
J. F. Shafroth, F. A. Williams, and A. B. Seaman, for plaintiff in error.
Teller & Orahood and Walcott & Vaile, for defendants in error.
HAYT, C.J. (after stating the facts).
The duty of railroad and other companies crossing highways to relieve the danger and inconvenience of such crossings has been long recognized under the common law. In State v. St Paul, M. & M. Ry. Co., 35 Minn. 131, 28 N.W. 3, this rule is stated as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. State ex rel. City of Omaha
... ... 25; ... Northwestern Fertilizing Co. v. Hyde Park, 97 U.S ... 663; Butchers' Union Slaughter-House & Live-Stock Landing ... Co. v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House ... Norris, 4 ... N.H. 16; City of Dubuque v. Illinois C. R. Co., 39 ... Iowa 56; People v. Supervisors of Orange County, 17 ... N.Y. 235; Boisdere v. Citizens Bank, 29 Am. Dec. [La.] ... ...
-
The Chicago, Indianapolis And Louisville Railway Co. v. State ex rel. Zimmerman
... ... property, and caused the people living along said highway to ... avoid its use when it was possible to do ... Lake Erie, etc., R. Co., ... 83 F. 284; People, ex rel., v. Union" Pacific R ... Co., 20 Colo. 186, 189-195, 37 P. 610 ... \xC2" ... rel., v. Dutchess, etc., R. Co., 58 N.Y. 152, ... approved in City of Moundsville v. Ohio River R ... Co., 37 W.Va. 92, 16 S.E. 514, 20 L ... ...
-
Cook v. Salt Lake City
... ... by Margaret A. Cook against Salt Lake City and the Denver & ... Rio Grande Railroad Company ... From a ... judgment for ... approaches thereto in good condition. State ex rel ... Minneapolis v. St. Paul, M. & M. R. Co., 98 ... Minn. 380, 108 N.W ... Co. v. Duluth, 208 U.S. 583, 28 S.Ct. 341, 52 ... L.Ed. 630; People v. U. P. Ry. Co., 20 ... Colo. 186, 37 P. 610; City of Minneapolis v. St ... ...
-
Atlanta & W.P.R. Co. v. City of Atlanta
... ... Ga. R. Co. v. Union Point, 119 Ga. 809, 816, 47 S.E ... 183, 186, and authorities cited ... the character made. People v. Union Pac. R. Co., 20 ... Colo. 186, 37 P. 610; Elliott on Roads and ... ...