People ex rel. Dept. of Public Works v. Mascotti
Decision Date | 13 September 1962 |
Citation | 24 Cal.Rptr. 679,206 Cal.App.2d 772 |
Court | California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of California acting by and through the DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Lydia MASCOTTI, also known as Lydia K. Mascotti, Defendant and Appellant. Civ. 25919. |
Appellant's petition for rehearing raises for the first time the claim that 'the Sheldon judgment is erroneous in that it violates the constitutional provisions requiring payment of just compensation,' because 'it purports to limit interest upon the principal award to the date of entry of the SHELDON judgment [R. 60] as distinct from the date of payment to or deposit for the appellant 'without strings' so that she could receive it without waiving her right to appeal upon the grounds heretofore appealed from.'
The point must be deemed waived by failure to present it in the briefs. (Smith v. Crocker First Nat. Bank, 152 Cal.App.2d 832, 837, 314 P.2d 237, 241.) (A. F. Estabrook Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., 177 Cal. 767, 771, 177 P. 848, 849.)
Petition for rehearing denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Holford
...122; CAMSI IV v. Hunter Technology Corp. (1991) 230 Cal.App.3d 1525, 1542, 282 Cal.Rptr. 80; People ex rel. Dept. of Public Works v. Mascotti (1962) 206 Cal.App.2d 772, 779, 24 Cal.Rptr. 679; see also 9 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (5th ed. 2008) Appeal, § 906, p. 968.) We relax this rule with re......
-
People, By and Through Dept. of Public Works v. Lagiss
...to a limited, severable portion of the case. (People ex rel. Dept. of Public Works v. Mascotti, 206 Cal.App.2d 772, 23 Cal.Rptr. 846, 24 Cal.Rptr. 679.) Severability exists only when the portion which has been selected for appeal can be reversed without affecting other portions of the judgm......
-
People v. Shaw
...(1915) 170 Cal. 192, 195, 149 P. 578; People ex rel. Dept. Public Works v. Mascotti (1962) 206 Cal.App.2d 772, 779, 23 Cal.Rptr. 846, 24 Cal.Rptr. 679; and see 3 Witkin, Cal.Procedure, Appeal, § 203, subd. (c), p. 2407), must yield to the exigencies of the situation which prescribe that the......
-
Baxter v. Phillips
...A.C.A. 701, 711, 79 Cal.Rptr. 454; People ex rel. Dept. of Pub. Wks. v. Mascotti (1962) 206 Cal.App.2d 772, 776, 778, 23 Cal.Rptr. 846, 24 Cal.Rptr. 679; Garcia v. San Gabriel Ready Mixt (1959) 173 Cal.App.2d 355, 358--359, 343 P.2d 327; Crandall v. McGrath (1942) 51 Cal.App.2d 438, 439, 12......