People ex rel. Dept. of Public Works v. Mascotti

Decision Date13 September 1962
Citation24 Cal.Rptr. 679,206 Cal.App.2d 772
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
PartiesThe PEOPLE of the State of California acting by and through the DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Lydia MASCOTTI, also known as Lydia K. Mascotti, Defendant and Appellant. Civ. 25919.

ASHBURN, Justice.

Appellant's petition for rehearing raises for the first time the claim that 'the Sheldon judgment is erroneous in that it violates the constitutional provisions requiring payment of just compensation,' because 'it purports to limit interest upon the principal award to the date of entry of the SHELDON judgment [R. 60] as distinct from the date of payment to or deposit for the appellant 'without strings' so that she could receive it without waiving her right to appeal upon the grounds heretofore appealed from.'

The point must be deemed waived by failure to present it in the briefs. 'Counsel are not permitted to argue their cases in a piecemeal fashion and points not previously argued will not be considered where raised for the first time on petition for rehearing. (Epperson v. Rosemond, 100 Cal.App.2d 344, 348, 223 P.2d 655, 224 P.2d 480; 4 Cal.Jur.2d, Appeal and Error, § 522, p. 365.)' (Smith v. Crocker First Nat. Bank, 152 Cal.App.2d 832, 837, 314 P.2d 237, 241.) 'No such point was suggested in the argument on which the petitioners submitted the cases for decision. It is the settled rule of this court that points made for the first time on petition for rehearing will not be considered.' (A. F. Estabrook Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., 177 Cal. 767, 771, 177 P. 848, 849.)

Petition for rehearing denied.

FOX, P. J., and HERNDON, J., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • People v. Holford
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • March 28, 2012
    ...122; CAMSI IV v. Hunter Technology Corp. (1991) 230 Cal.App.3d 1525, 1542, 282 Cal.Rptr. 80; People ex rel. Dept. of Public Works v. Mascotti (1962) 206 Cal.App.2d 772, 779, 24 Cal.Rptr. 679; see also 9 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (5th ed. 2008) Appeal, § 906, p. 968.) We relax this rule with re......
  • People, By and Through Dept. of Public Works v. Lagiss
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • December 6, 1963
    ...to a limited, severable portion of the case. (People ex rel. Dept. of Public Works v. Mascotti, 206 Cal.App.2d 772, 23 Cal.Rptr. 846, 24 Cal.Rptr. 679.) Severability exists only when the portion which has been selected for appeal can be reversed without affecting other portions of the judgm......
  • People v. Shaw
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • October 22, 1965
    ...(1915) 170 Cal. 192, 195, 149 P. 578; People ex rel. Dept. Public Works v. Mascotti (1962) 206 Cal.App.2d 772, 779, 23 Cal.Rptr. 846, 24 Cal.Rptr. 679; and see 3 Witkin, Cal.Procedure, Appeal, § 203, subd. (c), p. 2407), must yield to the exigencies of the situation which prescribe that the......
  • Baxter v. Phillips
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • February 19, 1970
    ...A.C.A. 701, 711, 79 Cal.Rptr. 454; People ex rel. Dept. of Pub. Wks. v. Mascotti (1962) 206 Cal.App.2d 772, 776, 778, 23 Cal.Rptr. 846, 24 Cal.Rptr. 679; Garcia v. San Gabriel Ready Mixt (1959) 173 Cal.App.2d 355, 358--359, 343 P.2d 327; Crandall v. McGrath (1942) 51 Cal.App.2d 438, 439, 12......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT