People ex rel. First Garden Bay Manor v. Chambers

Decision Date31 October 1955
Docket NumberNo. 6756,No. 6339,No. 6754,No. 6755,6754,6755,6756,6339
Citation145 N.Y.S.2d 329,286 A.D. 1042
PartiesPEOPLE ex rel. FIRST GARDEN BAY MANOR, Inc., Relator-Respondent, v. Harry B. CHAMBERS et al., constituting The Tax Commission of the City of New York, Respondents; Bertrand Bowitz and Aaron H. Shaffer, Appellants. (Block 1007, Lot 7, etc.--Tax Year 1947-8--Index/1947, and Five Additional Proceedings, similarly titled, for Tax Years 1948/49 to 1952/53.) PEOPLE ex rel. SECOND GARDEN BAY MANOR, Inc., Relator-Respondent, v. Harry B. CHAMBERS, et al., constituting The Tax Commission of the City of New York, Respondent; Bertrand Bowitz and Aaron H. Shaffer, Appellants. (Block 972, Lot 13, etc.--Tax Year 1947/48--Index/1947 and Five Additional Proceedings, similarly titled, for Tax Years 1948/49 to 1952/53.) PEOPLE ex rel. THIRD GARDEN BAY MANOR, Inc., Relator-Respondent, v. Harry B. CHAMBERS et al., constituting The Tax Commission of the City of New York, Respondents; Bertrand Bowitz and Aaron H. Shaffer, Appellants. (Block 946, Lot 24, etc.--Tax Year 1947/48--Index/1947 and Five Additional Proceedings, similarly titled, for Tax Years 1948/49 to 1952/53.) Application of MANOR PROPERTIES, Inc., Petitioner-Respondent, v. William E. BOYLAND et al., constituting The Tax Commission of the City of New York, Respondents; Bertrand Bowitz and Aaron H. Shaffer, Appellants. (Block 972, Lot 1--Tax Year 1952/53--Index/1952.)
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Aaron H. Shaffer, Bowitz & Shaffer, New York City, for appellants.

Sidney C. Norris, New York City, for respondents. Clarence S. Barasch, New York City, of counsel.

Before NOLAN, P. J., and WENZEL, SCHMIDT, BELDOCK and MURPHY, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

Orders granting motions for a substitution of attorneys, and fixing the compensation of appellants, the outgoing attorneys, for services rendered, reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the matter remitted to the Special Term for such further proceedings as may be proper and not inconsistent herewith.

Appellants were retained by the owners of real property, on a contingent basis, to attempt to secure reductions in the assessed valuation for real estate taxes of said real property. After various services had been performed by appellants, including the commencement of nineteen proceedings in the Supreme Court, appellants were advised by their clients that another attorney had been engaged, and motions for a substitution of attorneys were...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Arrow, Edelstein & Gross v. Rosco Productions
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • 29 Febrero 1984
    ...of quantum meruit, plaintiff must establish "proof of the services performed, and the value thereof." People v. Chambers, 286 A.D. 1042, 1042, 145 N.Y.S.2d 329, 330 (2d Dep't 1955). At trial, defendants did not dispute that plaintiff performed legal services;17 rather, the issue is whether ......
  • Jaslow v. United States, 66-C-949.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • 10 Febrero 1970
    ...Corp. v. Prismo Holding Corp., 257 App.Div. 671, 15 N.Y. S.2d 54 (1st Dept. 1939); People ex rel. First Garden Bay Manor, Inc. v. Chambers, 286 App.Div. 1042, 145 N.Y.S.2d 329 (2d Dept. 1955); Borup v. National Airlines, Inc., 159 F.Supp. 808 (S.D.N.Y. 1958); Paolillo v. American Export Isb......
  • Whitestone Savings & Loan Association v. Moring
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 31 Octubre 1955
    ... ... plaintiff in each action claims to hold a first mortgage. Plaintiff in action No. 1, hereinafter ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT