People ex rel. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Van Cleave
Decision Date | 19 October 1900 |
Citation | 58 N.E. 422,187 Ill. 125 |
Court | Illinois Supreme Court |
Parties | PEOPLE ex rel. OCEAN ACCIDENT & GUARANTEE CORP., Limited, v. VAN CLEAVE, Insurance Superintendent. |
Action by the people, on the relation of the Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corporation, Limited, for a writ of mandamus against James R.B. Van Cleave, state insurance superintendent. Writ granted.
1. Act April 21, 1899 (Laws 1899, p. 237), “to incorporate and to govern casualty insurance companies,” etc., by section 1 authorizes the incorporation of companies “for the purpose of issuing policies for any of the following kinds of insurance business.” Then follow seven subdivisions enumerating insurance against (1) accidents, (2) employer's liability, (3) loss of credits, (4) burglary or theft, (5) breakage of glass, (6) explosion or accidents to boilers and elevator machinery, (7) other lawful casualty risks. Section 2 provides, among other things (subdivision 6), that the charter of such company shall show the nature and kind of business to be transacted, which may include such kinds of business as are specified under subdivisions 1 and 2 of section 1 hereof, or under subdivisions 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 of section 1 hereof.” Held, that the latter provision does not have the effect of separating the kinds of insurance enumerated into two groups, so as to preclude a company which does the kind of business specified in subdivisions 1 and 2 from doing any or all of those specified in the other subdivisions, or vice versa, no reason being apparent for such separation, but that the word “or” in the language quoted should be construed to mean “and,” giving a company the right, on compliance with the act, to do any or all of the kinds of business specified.
2. Such act having provided for the licensing of foreign companies to do business in the state, the effect is to place them on the same footing as domestic companies, and on compliance with the requirements of the act a foreign company is entitled to a license to transact any or all of the kinds of insurance business enumerated therein for which it may qualify itself.
This is an original petition, filed in this court at the June term, 1900, by the people, upon the relation of the Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corporation, Limited, a foreign corporation organized and existing under an act of parliament of the kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, asking for a writ of mandamus commanding the defendant, the state insurance superintendent, to grant and issue to the petitioner a license to transact in the state of Illinois all of the six lines of insurance set forth in subdivisions numbered from 1 to 6, inclusive, of section 1 of “An act to incorporate and to govern casualty insurance companies, and to control such companies of this state and of other states doing business in the state of Illinois, and providing and fixing the punishment for violation of the provisions thereof, and to repeal all laws now existing which conflict therewith,” approved April 21, 1899, in force July 1, 1899. Laws 1899, p. 237. The defendant has interposed a demurrer to the petition. The above-entitled act of April 21, 1899, so far as it is necessary to set the same forth in order to understand the questions raised by the demurrer to the petition, is as follows:
* * *
* * * ”
It is alleged in the petition that in and by its charter petitioner is authorized to transact a general insurance business, including the various lines of insurance named in subdivisions from 1 to 6, inclusive, of section 1; that in April, 1898, petitioner filed with the defendant application for license to enter into and transact lines of business in Illinois known as “credit insurance,” being the line of insurance mentioned in subdivision 3 of section 1, as above set forth, in accordance with the laws of Illinois; that petitioner in all other respects did comply with the laws of Illinois concerning the issuance of said license; that defendant issued to petitioner a license to transact in Illinois the business of credit insurance; that petitioner complied with the laws of Illinois in regard thereto, and entered upon said business within this state, and has continued to transact the same ever since; that petitioner afterwards, in April, 1899, made application to defendant, as state...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Roberts v. Western-Southern Life Ins. Co.
...the phrase "in any action," as used in § 767, means "in every action." We agree. See, e.g., People ex rel. Ocean Accident & Guarantee v. Van Cleave, 187 Ill. 125, 134-35, 58 N.E. 422, 425 (1900). However, the statute does not declare that the statutory penalty is the exclusive means for com......
-
State ex Inf. Atty-Gen. v. Long-Bell Lumber Co.
...41 Mo. App. 665; Sylvester-Watts-Smyth Realty Co. v. Surety Co., 238 S.W. (Mo.) 494; Machen's Modern Law of Corp., sec. 50; People ex rel. v. Van Cleve, 187 Ill. 125, People v. Lumber Co., 164 Mich. 625; In re Humphrey Adv. Co., 177 Fed. 187; Pickard v. Hughey, 51 N.E. 133; Vokes v. Eaton (......
-
Scown v. Czarnecki
...‘all’ and synonymous with it. 2 Am. & Eng. Ency. of Law (2d Ed.) 414; 2 Cyc. 472; Purdy v. People, 4 Hill (N. Y.) 384;People v. Van Cleave, 187 Ill. 125, 58 N. E. 422;Johnson v. Grand Forks County, 16 N. D. 363, 113 N. W. 1071,125 Am. St. Rep. 662;Leonard v. Commissioners, 112 Pa. 622, 4 At......
-
State ex inf. Gentry v. Long-Bell Lumber Co.
...41 Mo.App. 665; Sylvester-Watts-Smyth Realty Co. v. Surety Co., 238 S.W. 494; Machen's Modern Law of Corp., sec. 50; People ex rel. v. Van Cleve, 187 Ill. 125; People v. Lumber Co., 164 Mich. 625; In Humphrey Adv. Co., 177 F. 187; Pickard v. Hughey, 51 N.E. 133; Vokes v. Eaton (Ky.), 85 S.W......