People ex rel. Spinney v. Fay

Decision Date29 March 1965
Citation258 N.Y.S.2d 637,23 A.D.2d 701
PartiesThe PEOPLE of the State of New York ex rel. Arthur SPINNEY, Relator-Appellant, v. Edward M. FAY, Warden, Green Haven Prison, Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Wallace M. Germain,Richmond Hill, for appellant.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen., New York City, for the People.

In a habeas corpus proceeding, relator appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, entered January 25, 1963, which dismissed the writ and remanded him to the custody of respondent. Order affirmed, without costs (cf. Matter of Hines v. State Bd. of Parole, 293 N.Y. 254, 257, 56 N.E.2d 572; People ex rel. Natoli v. Lewis, 287 N.Y. 478, 481, 41 N.E.2d 62; People ex rel. Di Lorenzo v. Fay, 13 A.D.2d 1034, 217 N.Y.S.2d 347; Matter of Mummiami v. New York State Bd. of Parole, 5 A.D.2d 923, 171 N.Y.S.2d 1018, cert. den. 362 U.S. 953, 80 S.Ct. 865, 4 L.Ed.2d 870).

BELDOCK, P. J., and UGHETTA, HILL, RABIN and BENJAMIN, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • People ex rel. Johnson v. Follette
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 13 Diciembre 1968
    ...York State Bd. of Parole, 5 A.D.2d 923, 171 N.Y.S.2d 1018, cert. den. 362 U.S. 953, 80 S.Ct. 865, 4 L.Ed.2d 870; People ex rel. Spinney v. Fay, 23 A.D.2d 701, 258 N.Y.S.2d 637). But whatever the Board's determination may be on the merits, it must be arrived at according to law (Matter of Hi......
  • People ex rel. Smith v. Deegan
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 7 Julio 1969
    ... ... Its discretion is absolute on the merits so long as it violates no positive statutory duty (Matter of Hines v. State Bd. of Parole, 293 N.Y. 254, 257, 56 N.E.2d 572, 573; People ex rel. Natoli v. Lewis, 287 N.Y. 478, 481, 41 N.E.2d 62, 64; People ex rel. Spinney v. Fay, 23 A.D.2d 701, 258 N.Y.S.2d ... 637; Matter of Mummiami v. New York State Bd. of Parole, 5 A.D.2d 923, 171 N.Y.S.2d 1018, cert. den. 362 U.S. 953, 80 S.Ct. 865, 4 L.Ed.2d 870) ...         In light of the foregoing, we agree that the parole revocation hearing is neither a 'trial' ... ...
  • People v. Brown
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 29 Marzo 1965

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT