People ex rel. Williams v. Follette
Decision Date | 17 June 1968 |
Citation | 292 N.Y.S.2d 190,30 A.D.2d 693 |
Parties | The PEOPLE, etc., ex rel. Robert WILLIAMS, Jr., Appellant, v. Harold W. FOLLETTE, Warden of Green Haven State Prison, Respondent. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Arthur L. Gellert, Poughkeepsie, for appellant.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen., of the State of New York, Albany, for respondent-respondent; Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Asst. Atty. Gen., by Murray Sylvester, Asst. Atty. Gen., of counsel.
Before BRENNAN, Acting P.J., and HOPKINS, BENJAMIN, MUNDER and MARTUSCELLO, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Appeal by relator from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated January 5, 1968, which dismissed the writ of habeas corpus herein.
Judgment affirmed, without costs. Appellant was indicted for the crime of murder in the first degree. He was found guilty of murder in the second degree and sentenced to 20 years to life. Thereafter the trial court set aside the conviction, on appellant's motion, after it was discovered that a juror had been guilty of misconduct. Appellant was subsequently re-arraigned on the original charge of murder in the first degree. After the jury was impaneled he voluntarily pleaded guilty to murder in the second degree and was sentenced on October 20, 1955 to 20 years to life.
On this appeal appellant contends that he was subjected to double jeopardy under the rule of United States ex rel. Hetenyi v. Wilkins, 2 Cir., 348 F.2d 844, cert. den. sub. nom. Mancusi v. Hetenyi, 383 U.S. 913, 86 S.Ct. 896, 15 L.Ed.2d 667 and People v. Ressler, 17 N.Y.2d 174, 269 N.Y.S.2d 414, 216 N.E.2d 582.
We are of the opinion that appellant waived his right to raise the defense of double jeopardy by first raising it in this habeas corpus proceeding about 12 years after his conviction (People v. Cignarale, 110 N.Y. 23, 17 N.E. 135; People v. McGrath, 202 N.Y. 445, 96 N.E. 92; People v. Allen, 18 A.D.2d 840, 238 N.Y.S.2d 70; United States v. Hoyland, 7 Cir., 264 F.2d 346, 351; Haddad v. United States, 9 Cir., 349 F.2d 511, 514).
We agree with the language of the court in United States v. Hoyland (supra, 264 F.2d p. 351), where it was held that:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. La Ruffa
...well. (Former Code Crim.Pro., §§ 332, 339; CPL 210.20; see People v. Cignarale, 110 N.Y. 23, 29, 17 N.E. 135; People ex rel. Williams v. Follette, 30 A.D.2d 693, 292 N.Y.S.2d 190, aff'd 24 N.Y.2d 949, 302 N.Y.S.2d 584, 250 N.E.2d 71; People v. Lynch, 40 A.D.2d 856, 337 N.Y.S.2d 763; People ......
-
People v. Michael
...(Former Code Crim. Proc., §§ 332, 339; CPL 210.20; see People v. Cignarale, 110 N.Y. 23, 29, 17 N.E. 135; People ex rel. Williams v. Follette, 30 A.D.2d 693, 292 N.Y.S.2d 190, aff'd 24 N.Y.2d 949, 302 N.Y.S.2d 584, 250 N.E.2d 71; People v. Lynch, 40 A.D.2d 856, 337 N.Y.S.2d 763; People v. A......
-
Donaldson v. Rose
...ex rel. Dunlap v. Utecht, 206 Minn. 41, 287 N.W. 229; Lowther v. Maxwell, 175 Ohio St. 39, 191 N.E.2d 172; People ex rel. Williams v. Follette, 292 N.Y.S.2d 190, 30 A.D.2d 693, affd. 24 N.Y.2d 949, 302 N.Y.S.2d 584, 250 N.E.2d 71. See also: 39 C.J.S., Habeas Corpus § ...
-
People ex rel. Pendleton v. Smith, C--50
...for the first time. Courts have generally resisted this. People v. Allen, 18 A.D.2d 840, 238 N.Y.S.2d 70; People ex rel. Williams v. Follette, 30 A.D.2d 693, 292 N.Y.S.2d 190, Affirmed 24 N.Y.2d 949, 302 N.Y.S.2d 584, 250 N.E.2d 71; Thomas v. LaRuffa (New York Court of Appeals) However, dec......