People of the State of Mich. v. Hoffman
Decision Date | 23 May 2012 |
Docket Number | Docket No. 144235.,COA No. 306314. |
Citation | 812 N.W.2d 769,491 Mich. 924 |
Parties | PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Anthony James HOFFMAN, Defendant–Appellant. |
Court | Michigan Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 8, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is consideredand, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration, as on leave granted, of the defendant's second issue regarding a claimed failure of the sentencing court to comply with the procedural requirements of MCL 28.724(5) and MCL 769.1(13) before ordering the defendant to register as a sex offender. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Hoffman, 306314
...procedural requirements of MCL 28.724(5) and MCL 769.1(13) before ordering defendant to register as a sex offender." People v Hoffman, 491 Mich 924; 812 NW2d 769 (2012).1 We vacate defendant's sentence and remand for resentencing. In pleading guilty, defendant admitted that he had placed a ......