People's Nat. Bank of Winston-Salem v. Southern States Finance Co.

Decision Date09 June 1926
Docket Number353.
Citation133 S.E. 415
Parties192 N.C. 69, 48 A.L.R. 519 v. SOUTHERN STATES FINANCE CO. et al. PEOPLE'S NAT. BANK OF WINSTON-SALEM
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court

Appeal from Superior Court, Forsyth County; Schenck, Judge.

Action by the People's National Bank of Winston-Salem against the Southern States Finance Company and another. Judgment for first-named defendant, and plaintiff appeals. New trial.

Clarkson J., dissenting.

One making agreement to receive from national bank information as to solvency and financial reputation of others is conclusively presumed to know that he acquires no rights thereby enforceable against bank.

On February 26, 1924, J. H. Mackie, of Yadkin county, N. C executed his note, due six months after date, payable to Southern States Finance Company, of Charlotte, N. C., or order, for $16,500, negotiable and payable at the People's National Bank of Winston-Salem, N.C. This note together with a subscription for 1,650 shares of the stock of the Southern States Finance Company, was delivered by J. H Mackie to S. F. Penry, who had, as agent for the Finance Company, solicited the said subscription. The consideration for the note was the purchase price of the stock. It was agreed between Mackie and Penry that, if the subscription and note were not accepted by Southern States Finance Company, and if the certificates were not issued, the note should be returned to Mackie. Thereafter Penry submitted the subscription and the note to Southern States Finance Company at Charlotte.

The Southern States Finance Company communicated by telephone with Col. W. A. Blair, vice president of the People's Bank of Winston-Salem, N. C., in order to secure information upon which to determine whether or not it would accept said note, and issue the certificates for the stock to J. H. Mackie. After several phone conversations with Col. Blair relative to Mackie and the note, then in its possession, Southern States Finance Company indorsed the note, and sent it by Penry to plaintiff at Winston-Salem. Plaintiff issued certificates of deposit, aggregating $16,500, payable to Southern States Finance Company, and delivered same to Penry. Penry thereupon delivered the note, with the indorsement of Southern States Finance Company, to plaintiff. Penry then took the certificates of deposit to Charlotte, and delivered same to Southern States Finance Company. The Finance Company thereupon issued certificates of stock in accordance with his subscription to J. H. Mackie. These certificates of stock were delivered by Penry to Mackie at his home in Yadkin county. The certificates of deposit have been paid by plaintiff.

This is an action by plaintiff, as holder of the note, to recover of J. H. Mackie, as maker, and of defendant, Southern States Finance Company, as indorser, the sum of $16,500 and accrued interest. No answer was filed by defendant J. H. Mackie.

Southern States Finance Company, in defense of plaintiff's action upon said note, says:

"(1) That on and for some time prior to February 26, 1924 plaintiff, People's National Bank of Winston-Salem, N. C., was the regular depository of this defendant in which defendant kept on deposit a considerable portion of its funds, and the vice president of plaintiff, who has active charge of its affairs, was a member of the advisory board of this defendant, as representative of the plaintiff bank, and, according to the course of business of this defendant, it submitted to the plaintiff bank and to its said vice president all paper which it took in the regular course of business from the vicinity in which plaintiff bank did business, and this defendant was accustomed to rely, and did rely, upon the information given it by the plaintiff bank and its said vice president with regard to the financial standing and responsibility of persons in the neighborhood of plaintiff bank from which this defendant purchased all papers and securities, and for the service and information rendered by the plaintiff and its said vice president, the plaintiff was duly compensated by this defendant, and this defendant had a right to rely upon information received by it from the plaintiff.

"(2) That the plaintiff, well knowing the confidence reposed in it by this defendant, abused the confidence of this defendant in the matter of the indorsement hereinbefore described, and, as this defendant is informed and believes, conspired and agreed with certain persons against whom it held insolvent papers to obtain security for a certain unsecured indebtedness at the expense of this defendant, and, with intent to cheat and defraud this defendant, made false and fraudulent representations to this defendant, and obtained from defendant the indorsement to the note of J. H. Mackie, as hereinafter more fully set forth.

"(3) That prior to the said 26th day of February, 1924, the plaintiff held worthless and unsecured paper made or indorsed by Webb S. Alexander, J. H. Mackie, F. W. Hanes, and others, aggregating approximately $16,500. That plaintiff, being desirous of obtaining some security for the said worthless indebtedness, entered into an agreement with the said Alexander and others, as defendant is advised and believes, by the terms of which the said Alexander and others were to sell to the said Mackie $16,500 of stock in the Southern Finance Company, which was to be placed by Mackie as collateral to a note of the said Hanes, which was to be given in lieu of the aforesaid worthless paper. That the plaintiff was to induce this defendant to issue the said stock for the worthless note of Mackie by representing to this defendant that the said Mackie was solvent, and that his said note was good, and was to obtain the indorsement of this defendant on said note by said representation, and by offering to discount same for defendant.

"(4) That, in pursuance of the aforesaid fraudulent scheme and conspiracy, the said Webb S. Alexander and certain of his associates did obtain the $16,500 note sued on in this action from the said J. H. Mackie, and thereupon presented same, together with a stock subscription for $16,500 stock, to this defendant. That, before this defendant would accept said note, it made inquiry of the plaintiff as to the solvency and responsibility of the said J. H. Mackie, and was assured by plaintiff that the said J. H. Mackie was solvent and responsible, and that this defendant would be safe in taking said note in payment of his stock subscription and agreed that if this defendant would take said note, plaintiff would purchase same from the defendant upon its indorsement, and that, relying upon the said representations made to this defendant by the plaintiff, as aforesaid, this defendant issued its stock to the said J. H. Mackie in the sum of $16,500, and indorsed the note sued on to plaintiff. That this defendant thereupon delivered the said stock and the said note to one S. F. Penry, who was acting in concert with the plaintiff and the said Webb S. Alexander, to the end that the said note might be delivered to the plaintiff, and that the stock might be pledged as security to the said note, defendant assuming and believing that the said stock would be placed with plaintiff as security for the note given for the purchase price of said stock, but this defendant has recently learned that the plaintiff did not place the said stock as security to the said note given for its purchase price, as aforesaid, but allowed same to be placed as security for a note of one F. W. Hanes, which note was given to take up the aforesaid worthless paper given by Mackie. Hanes, Webb S. Alexander, and others, as aforesaid, and that plaintiff thereupon held the said $16,500 note signed by defendant Mackie without any security whatever for the payment of same, except the indorsement of this defendant obtained in the fraudulent manner aforesaid.

"(5) That, at the time plaintiff obtained from this defendant its indorsement on the said promissory note, the said J. H. Mackie was not solvent or responsible, and his credit was not good for $16,500, but, on the contrary, he was involved in debt and insolvent, and his note was worthless, as the plaintiff then and there well knew. That the plaintiff made the aforesaid false representations as to the solvency and responsibility of the said J. H. Mackie for the purpose of deceiving and defrauding this defendant, and by means thereof did deceive and defraud and obtained from this defendant the issuance of said stock and indorsement aforesaid, all to the great damage of this defendant, and in breach of the trust and confidence reposed by this defendant in the plaintiff.

"(6) That in the manner and way aforesaid the plaintiff obtained from the defendant its indorsement on the worthless note of J. H. Mackie for the sum of $16,500, and also obtained $16,500 of the stock of this defendant as collateral security to the aforesaid worthless loans which it held, and for which the practically worthless note of F. W. Hanes, secured by the aforesaid stock, was exchanged as aforesaid. That, after obtaining the said stock of the said Mackie, as this defendant is informed and believes, plaintiff proceeded to allow the said Webb S. Alexander to sell said stock or a large portion thereof, and applied the proceeds on the said note of Hanes given for said worthless indebtedness.

"(7) That it was understood and agreed, at the time the said stock was issued to J. H. Mackie, that same should be pledged as collateral to the note of the said J. H. Mackie purchased by the plaintiff as aforesaid, and this defendant is informed and believes that the said J. H. Mackie did put up said stock as collateral to said note, and this defendant avers that this plaintiff, by relinquishing its rights against said stock as...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT