People v. Abruzzi

Decision Date12 May 1977
Citation42 N.Y.2d 813,396 N.Y.S.2d 649
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
Parties, 364 N.E.2d 1342 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Appellant, v. William ABRUZZI, Respondent.

Order affirmed on the opinion by Mr. Justice Samuel Rabin at the Appellate Division (52 A.D.2d 499, 385 N.Y.S.2d 94).

All concur except JASEN, J., who dissents and votes to reverse in the following memorandum: I would reverse the order of the Appellate Division and reinstate the judgment of conviction for the crime of sexual abuse in the first degree for the reasons stated in the opinion by Judge Joseph Jiudice of Dutchess County Court. I also agree with so much of the dissenting opinion by Mr. Justice James D. Hopkins at the Appellate Division as states that the doctrine of the taint of the poisonous tree should not be extended to include evidence of the personal observation by a police officer of a crime committed in his presence.

To continue reading

Request your trial
18 cases
  • People v. Vernon B.
    • United States
    • New York Criminal Court
    • 19 Noviembre 2012
    ...480 U.S. at 300–301, 107 S.Ct. 1134 [1987];People v. Abruzzi, 52 A.D.2d 499, 385 N.Y.S.2d 94 [2nd Dept.1976], affd.42 N.Y.2d 813, 396 N.Y.S.2d 649, 364 N.E.2d 1342 [1977] ). This conclusion is, not coincidentally, consistent with New York's statutory definition of trespass, which would appl......
  • People v. Quattrachi
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 1 Mayo 1978
    ...v. Gleeson, 36 N.Y.2d 462, 369 N.Y.S.2d 113, 330 N.E.2d 72; People v. Abruzzi, 52 A.D.2d 499, 385 N.Y.S.2d 94, affd., 42 N.Y.2d 813, 396 N.Y.S.2d 649, 364 N.E.2d 1342). At the time the agents entered, they had only a vague suspicion, based upon an anonymous telephone call, that defendants w......
  • People v. Theodore
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 13 Febrero 2014
    ...( see People v. Saurini, 201 A.D.2d 869, 607 N.Y.S.2d 518;People v. Abruzzi, 52 A.D.2d 499, 385 N.Y.S.2d 94,affd.42 N.Y.2d 813, 396 N.Y.S.2d 649, 364 N.E.2d 1342;United States v. Wells, 648 F.3d 671, 677;United States v. Howe, 414 Fed.Appx. 579, 581;Lundstrom v. Romero, 616 F.3d 1108, 1128–......
  • People v. O'Dell
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 25 Marzo 2016
    ...59 N.Y.2d 121, 126–127, 463 N.Y.S.2d 753, 450 N.E.2d 673 ; People v. Abruzzi, 52 A.D.2d 499, 504, 385 N.Y.S.2d 94, affd. 42 N.Y.2d 813, 396 N.Y.S.2d 649, 364 N.E.2d 1342, cert. denied 434 U.S. 921, 98 S.Ct. 396, 54 L.Ed.2d 278 ). Even assuming, arguendo, that the observations of the police ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT