People v. Adams
| Decision Date | 24 April 2009 |
| Citation | 908 N.E.2d 929,12 N.Y.3d 813 |
| Parties | PEOPLE v. ADAMS. |
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
Appeal from 4th Dept.: 59 A.D.3d 928, 872 N.Y.S.2d 616 (Erie).
Application for leave to criminal appeal Denied. (Jones, J.).
To continue reading
Request your trial
7 cases
-
People v. Brown
... ... Defendant failed to preserve for our review his further contention, raised in his pro se supplemental brief, that the charge of sexual abuse in the first degree set forth in the indictment was not adequately specific [946 N.Y.S.2d 764]( see People v. Adams, 59 A.D.3d 928, 929, 872 N.Y.S.2d 616,lv. denied12 N.Y.3d 813, 881 N.Y.S.2d 21, 908 N.E.2d 929;see also People v. Soto, 44 N.Y.2d 683, 684, 405 N.Y.S.2d 434, 376 N.E.2d 907). In [96 A.D.3d 1564]any event, that contention lacks merit. The indictment properly provided defendant with fair notice of ... ...
-
People v. Healy
... ... Biro , 85 A.D.3d 1570, 1571, 925 N.Y.S.2d 285 [4th Dept. 2011] ; see People v. Powell , 81 A.D.3d 1307, 1307, 916 N.Y.S.2d 385 [4th Dept. 2011], lv denied 17 N.Y.3d 799, 929 N.Y.S.2d 107, 952 N.E.2d 1102 [2011] ; People v. Adams , 59 A.D.3d 928, 929, 872 N.Y.S.2d 616 [4th Dept. 2009], lv denied 12 N.Y.3d 813, 881 N.Y.S.2d 21, 908 N.E.2d 929 [2009] ). Nor was defendant denied effective assistance by defense counsel's failure to call a witness to rebut the People's expert witness (see People v. Nicholson , 118 A.D.3d 1423, ... ...
-
People v. Carey
... ... Soto, 44 N.Y.2d 683, 405 N.Y.S.2d 434, 376 N.E.2d 907; People v. Erle, 83 A.D.3d 1442, 1443, 919 N.Y.S.2d 742, lv. denied 17 N.Y.3d 794, 929 N.Y.S.2d 102, 952 N.E.2d 1097; People v. Adams, 59 A.D.3d 928, 872 N.Y.S.2d 616, lv. denied 12 N.Y.3d 813, 881 N.Y.S.2d 21, 908 N.E.2d 929). We decline to exercise our power to address[92 A.D.3d 1225] those contentions as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice ( see CPL 470.15[6][a] ). We reject defendant's further contention that ... ...
-
People v. Redfield
... ... Contrary to defendant's contention, the trial testimony of the victim was not so inconsistent or unbelievable as to render it incredible as a matter of law (People v. Adams, 59 A.D.3d 928, 929, 872 N.Y.S.2d 616, lv. denied 12 N.Y.3d 813, 881 N.Y.S.2d 21, 908 N.E.2d 929 ; see People v. Black, 38 A.D.3d 1283, 1285, 832 N.Y.S.2d 375, lv. denied 8 N.Y.3d 982, 838 N.Y.S.2d 485, 869 N.E.2d 661 ). We reject defendant's contention that Supreme Court erred in permitting the ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results