People v. Adonis
| Decision Date | 09 July 2014 |
| Citation | 988 N.Y.S.2d 902,2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 05196,119 A.D.3d 700 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Ariste ADONIS, appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Alvin L. Spitzer, Pearl River, N.Y., for appellant.
Thomas P. Zugibe, District Attorney, New City, N.Y. (Itamar J. Yeger and Anthony R. Dellicarri of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Alfieri, Jr., J.), rendered September 14, 2009, convicting him of rape in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's first trial ended in a mistrial when the trial court dismissed a sworn juror on the ground that the juror was unqualified, and there was no alternate to replace the juror ( see CPL 270.35[1]; 280.10[3] ). The defendant was tried again and convicted of rape in the second degree.
On appeal, the defendant contends that double jeopardy principles barred his retrial because, notwithstanding his own counsel's request for a mistrial during his first trial, a demonstration of “manifest necessity” was required prior to the declaration of a mistrial, and no such “manifest necessity” was established. These contentions are unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05[2]; People v. Hambrick, 96 A.D.3d 972, 973, 947 N.Y.S.2d 139), and, in any event, without merit ( see Matter of Davis v. Brown, 87 N.Y.2d 626, 630, 641 N.Y.S.2d 819, 664 N.E.2d 884;People v. Hambrick, 96 A.D.3d at 973, 947 N.Y.S.2d 139). Further with respect to his double jeopardy claim, the defendant specifically contends that the declaration of a mistrial in the first trial was not the product of manifest necessity because the trial court improperly proceeded without selecting alternate jurors, and improperly dismissed the sworn juror. The defendant waived these contentions, as his counsel consented to proceeding without alternate jurors, and to the discharge of the sworn juror ( see People v. White, 53 N.Y.2d 721, 723, 439 N.Y.S.2d 333, 421 N.E.2d 825;People v. Colville, 79 A.D.3d 189, 198, 909 N.Y.S.2d 463,revd. on other grounds 20 N.Y.3d 20, 955 N.Y.S.2d 799, 979 N.E.2d 1125).
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Hubsher
..., 170 A.D.3d 1037, 1038, 94 N.Y.S.3d 614 ; People v. Prince , 128 A.D.3d 987, 988, 10 N.Y.S.3d 146 ; People v. Adonis , 119 A.D.3d 700, 701, 988 N.Y.S.2d 902 ). In addition, the defendant consented in writing in open court in the presence of the Supreme Court to the substitution of an alter......
-
People v. Prince
...expressly consented to the discharge (see People v. Ortiz, 92 N.Y.2d 955, 957, 683 N.Y.S.2d 158, 705 N.E.2d 1199 ; People v. Adonis, 119 A.D.3d 700, 701, 988 N.Y.S.2d 902 ). The defendant's contention that his waiver was not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary is unsupported by the record (......
-
People v. Alman
...review as the defendant failed to object to the court's declaration of a mistrial on this, or any other, ground (see People v. Adonis , 119 A.D.3d 700, 701, 988 N.Y.S.2d 902 ; People v. Hambrick , 96 A.D.3d 972, 973, 947 N.Y.S.2d 139 ). To the extent that the defendant's claim that his fede......
-
People v. James
...a retrial was established (see CPL 470.05[2] ; People v. White, 53 N.Y.2d 721, 723, 439 N.Y.S.2d 333, 421 N.E.2d 825 ; People v. Adonis, 119 A.D.3d 700, 988 N.Y.S.2d 902 ; People v. Hambrick, 96 A.D.3d 972, 947 N.Y.S.2d 139 ). In any event, these contentions are without merit (see Matter of......