People v. Alexander

• Decision Date: 20 March 2013
• Citation: 104 A.D.3d 862,960 N.Y.S.2d 659,2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 01839
• Parties: The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Keith ALEXANDER, appellant.
• Court: New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

104 A.D.3d 862

960 N.Y.S.2d 659

2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 01839

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent,

v.Keith ALEXANDER, appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

March 20, 2013.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Barry Stendig of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano and Merri Turk Lasky of counsel; Andrew Dykens on the memorandum), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Griffin, J.), imposed January 20, 2011, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive ( see People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257, 264–267, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645;People v. Ramos, 7 N.Y.3d 737, 738, 819 N.Y.S.2d 853, 853 N.E.2d 222;People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 255, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145;People v. Hidalgo, 91 N.Y.2d 733, 735, 675 N.Y.S.2d 327, 698 N.E.2d 46;People v. Foy, 89 A.D.3d 1103, 1103, 933 N.Y.S.2d 599;People v. Pertillar, 37 A.D.3d 740, 831 N.Y.S.2d 212).

ENG, P.J., MASTRO, DICKERSON, LOTT and MILLER, JJ., concur.