People v. Alfaro

Decision Date02 June 1983
Citation192 Cal.Rptr. 178,143 Cal.App.3d 528
Partiesw Previously published at 143 Cal.App.3d 528, 144 Cal.App.3d 683 143 Cal.App.3d 528, 144 Cal.App.3d 683 PEOPLE of the State of California, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Rafael Vargas ALFARO et al., Defendants and Respondents. A019583.
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • State v. Pickering
    • United States
    • Maine Supreme Court
    • July 1, 1983
    ...the prosecutor may deny a defendant a jury trial by opting to go the route of the traffic infraction.5 Cf. People v. Alfaro, 144 Cal.App.3d 683, 192 Cal.Rptr. 178 (Cal.Ct.App. June 2, 1983) (striking down the 0.10% blood alcohol standard of a remarkably similar California statute as unconst......
  • People v. Schmidt
    • United States
    • New York City Court
    • April 30, 1984
    ...constitutionally infirm. Alfaro Defendant Schmidt's position was enunciated by the California Court of Appeals in People v. Alfaro, 192 Cal.Rptr. 178 (Cal.App. 1 Dist.1983) (reported in Advance Sheet only, not officially reported). The Alfaro court held that Section 23152(b) of the Californ......
  • Fuenning v. Superior Court In and For Maricopa County
    • United States
    • Arizona Supreme Court
    • December 15, 1983
    ...and a variety of other reasons. A similar contention was recently considered by a California court of appeals in People v. Alfaro, 143 Cal.App.3d 528, 192 Cal.Rptr. 178 (1983). Distinguishing the cases in which chemical test results provide only a presumption that the defendant was "under t......
  • Burg v. Municipal Court for Santa Clara Judicial Dist. of Santa Clara County
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • June 22, 1983
    ...J., concur. 1 All statutory citations are to the Vehicle Code unless otherwise indicated.2 We are aware of People v. Alfaro (1983) 143 Cal.App.3d 528, 192 Cal.Rptr. 178, in which Division One of this court declared section 23152, subdivision (b), unconstitutional. We find the dissenting opi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT