People v. Allen

Decision Date15 August 1974
Docket NumberNo. 58011,58011
Citation317 N.E.2d 633,22 Ill.App.3d 800
PartiesPEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dale ALLEN (Impleaded), Defendant-Appellant.
CourtUnited States Appellate Court of Illinois

James J. Doherty, Public Defender of Cook County, Chicago, for defendant-appellant.

Bernard Carey, State's Atty., of Cook County, Chicago, for plaintiff-appellee.

McGLOON, Justice:

Dale Allen and his co-defendant, James Nanz, were indicted for aggravated battery and attempt to commit murder. They were tried by a judge, without a jury, in the circuit court of Cook County. At the close of the evidence the prosecution dropped the attempt murder charges and the trial court found both men guilty of aggravated battery. Allen was sentenced to a term of one to three years in the penitentiary. Nanz was sentenced to four years probation, the fitst six months to be served in the House of Correction. Dale Allen has appealed from his conviction.

He presents two issues for review. He contends that it was prejudicial error for the trial court to allow the use of a certain interpreter during the trial testimony. He complains that the interpreter was a friend of the complaining witness, a witness at trial, an interested party, and a person who had personal knowledge of the facts of the case. He argues that the interpreter should have been disqualified for these reasons. He also contends that the evidence was not sufficient to prove his guilt.

We reverse and remand.

On the evening of August 15, 1972, Hussein Gooba, the complaining witness, received stab wounds. The prosecution's version of the incident and the defendants' version were contradictory. The prosecution's case-in-chief consisted of the testimony of Hussein Gooba and a police officer who investigated the incident. Gooba spoke no English and Mohammed Nassar served as the interpreter. Throughout the trial defense counsel objected strenuously to the use of Nassar as an interpreter. The trial court overruled these objections.

Defense counsel's objection was that Nassar was a close personal friend of Gooba and that Nassar was interested in the outcome of the case. The stabbing incident began with Gooba's visiting Nassar's apartment at 4638 N. Albany St., in Chicago, Illinois. As Gooba was leaving the apartment building, at about 10:00 P.M., three young men attacked him. Two had knives; one had a razor strop. At trial Gooba identified Allen and Nanz as two of the three. He testified that Allen had stabbed him with a knife, and that Nanz had hit him with a razor strop. Gooba escaped from the three men and ran into the apartment building where Nassar lived. He banged on the door of Nassar's apartment. Eventually Nassar opened the door and let Gooba into his apartment. Nassar called the police.

The police arrested Allen at the scene. Gooba saw Allen in a police car and made gestures to the effect that Allen was responsible for his wounds. The police questioned Gooba at the scene and in the hospital two days after the incident. Nassar was his interpreter both times. Nassar latter testified that he gave his own account of the incident to the police on the night of the stabbing. During the direct examination of Gooba, defense counsel again objected to Nassar as interpreter. He based his objection on the allegation that Nassar had observed the attack and could not be disinterested. He also implied that because all of Gooba's verbal communication with the police before trial had been through Nassar, Nassar could have 'tailored' Gooba's account of the incident to fit his own reconstruction.

The trial court called Nassar as a court's witness and allowed defense counsel to cross-examine him. Hassar testified that he heard screams and banging on the door and went downstairs to let Gooba in. In response to defense counsel's inquiry he further testified that he did not hear any shots fired and did not own a gun. The relevance of these responses became more apparent later on during the trial. A police officer testified that at the police station after the incident, Nanz, the co-defendant, told him that during the struggle an unidentified person fired shots from the second floor window of 4638 N. Albany into the courtyard. Allen maintained that one of these shots grazed him in the side. Nanz corroborated this testimony and Allen was later treated for gunshot wounds at the hospital. It was defendants' theory that Nassar may have fired the shots and was, therefore, directly involved in the incident. The police officers who searched Nassar's apartment did not find a gun.

At trial defendants presented evidence to show that the attack on Gooba was prompted by the screams of Celina Gallant, an acquaintance of the defendants, whom Gooba allegedly attacked with a knife.

Allen and Nanz had attended a birthday party for Nanz in an apartment at 4640 N. Albany Street. This address was located in the same courtyard building, just opposite Nassar's address. Celina Gallant was standing alone in the courtyard waiting for Richard Thomas, who had returned to the apartment to get his cigarettes. According to Celina, a man with a knife, whom she identified at trial as Gooba, grabbed her and ripped her blouse. Allen, Nanz, and Thomas heard her screams and came to her rescue. Celina broke away from her assailant and ran from the courtyard. Diane Matera, a friend, was entering the courtyard and saw Celina running. She accompanied Celina to her home which was about 10 blocks away.

The three men struggled with Gooba in an attempt to get the knife away from him. During the struggle Nanz hit Gooba with a razor...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • State v. Van Tran
    • United States
    • Tennessee Supreme Court
    • September 27, 1993
    ...selecting interpreter, and its decision would not be disturbed unless evidence of prejudice could be inferred); People v. Allen, 22 Ill.App.3d 800, 317 N.E.2d 633, 635 (1974) (Trial court abused its discretion to determine fitness of person used as interpreter); State v. Burns, 78 N.W. 681 ......
  • State v. Murray
    • United States
    • Arizona Court of Appeals
    • October 4, 2019
    ...between him and the defendant held in a foreign language."). The case Murray cites to argue otherwise, People v. Allen, 22 Ill.App.3d 800, 317 N.E.2d 633, 633-35 (1974), involved a much different situation where the trial court, over the defendant’s objection, allowed the state to use an in......
  • State in Interest of R. R.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • January 31, 1979
    ...Frank, 494 F.2d 145 (2d Cir. 1974), Cert. denied 419 U.S. 828, 95 S.Ct. 48, 42 L.Ed.2d 52 (1974) (Spanish); People v. Allen, 22 Ill.App.3d 800, 317 N.E.2d 633 (Ct.App.1974) (Arabic); Lujan v. United States, 209 F.2d 190 (10th Cir. 1953) (American Indian); 3 Wigmore, supra, § 811 at 279-280.......
  • People v. Ortiz
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • August 15, 1974
    ... ... The record does not establish the need for an interpreter. People v. Allen (1971), 132 Ill.App.2d 1015, 270 N.E.2d 54 ...         Defendant's final argument in his post-conviction appeal is that the prosecution purposely withheld evidence helpful to the defense. This contention refers to the above mentioned police reports and report of proceedings of the ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT