People v. Alolafi, 109742

• Decision Date: 21 March 2019
• Docket Number: 109742
• Parties: The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Melissa ALOLAFI, Appellant.
• Court: New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

170 A.D.3d 1379

96 N.Y.S.3d 720

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent,

v.Melissa ALOLAFI, Appellant.

109742

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Calendar Date: February 13, 2019

Decided and Entered: March 21, 2019

Donnial K. Hinds, Albany, for appellant.

Robert M. Carney, District Attorney, Schenectady (Peter H. Willis of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Lynch, Devine and Rumsey, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Rumsey, J.Defendant waived indictment and agreed to be prosecuted by a superior court information charging her with the crimes of aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle (hereinafter AUO) in the first degree and misdemeanor driving while intoxicated. Pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement, defendant purportedly waived the right to appeal and pleaded guilty as charged, with the understanding that sentencing would be adjourned and she would be allowed to participate in the Schenectady County Drug Treatment Court program. Upon successful completion of the program, it was understood that she would have the opportunity to withdraw her guilty plea to AUO in the first degree and plead guilty to AUO in the third degree, a misdemeanor, and receive two concurrent sentences of three years of probation. It was also agreed that if defendant failed to successfully complete the program, she would be sentenced to 1 to 3 years in prison. After defendant twice absconded from the program and a bench warrant resulted in her arrest, she was sentenced to 1 to 3 years in prison on the AUO in the first degree conviction and a jail term of one year for the driving while intoxicated conviction, with the jail term being merged into the other sentence. Defendant appeals.

We affirm. Preliminarily, we agree with defendant that her appeal waiver was not valid. County Court did not advise her that the right to appeal is separate and distinct from the rights automatically forfeited by a guilty plea (see People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 256, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 [2006] ; People v. Herbert, 147 A.D.3d 1208, 1208, 47 N.Y.S.3d 500 [2017] ). Although defendant executed a written waiver, the court did not adequately ensure that defendant had read the waiver or understood its contents or ramifications (see People v. White, 163 A.D.3d 1358, 1358, 78 N.Y.S.3d 527 [2018], lvs denied 32 N.Y.3d 1002, 1009, 86 N.Y.S.3d 760, 111 N.E.3d 1116 [2018] ; People v. Williams, 132 A.D.3d 1155, 1155, 20 N.Y.S.3d 176 [2015], lv denied 27 N.Y.3d 1157, 39 N.Y.S.3d 390, 62 N.E.3d 130 [2016] ).

Contrary to defendant's contention, County Court did not abuse its discretion by sentencing her to a prison term, rather than continuing her in the drug court program, inasmuch...