People v. Amador, 1999-00562.
Decision Date | 04 October 2004 |
Docket Number | 1999-00562. |
Citation | 11 A.D.3d 473,2004 NY Slip Op 07184,782 N.Y.S.2d 371 |
Parties | THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSE AMADOR, Appellant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that the judgment, as amended, is affirmed.
The Supreme Court correctly found that the ruse used by the police to convince the defendant to leave his home was not coercive or so fundamentally unfair as to deny due process (see Payton v New York, 445 US 573, 576 [1980]; People v Minley, 68 NY2d 952 [1986]; People v Tarsia, 50 NY2d 1, 11 [1980]; People v Rosario, 186 AD2d 598 [1992]; People v Ross, 158 AD2d 560, 561 [1990]; People v Hill, 138 AD2d 629 [1988]; cf. People v Jefferson, 43 AD2d 112, 113 [1973]).
The defendant's remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review or do not require reversal.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Kluge
... ... LaGuerre, 29 A.D.3d 820, 822, 815 N.Y.S.2d 211, quoting People v. Amador, 11 A.D.3d 473, 474, 782 N.Y.S.2d 371 ). Here, the defendant, who was in custody on the assault charge, had no reasonable expectation of privacy in ... ...
-
People v. Moreaux
... ... Amador , 11 A.D.3d 473, 474, 782 N.Y.S.2d 371 (2nd Dept. 2004) (ruse used by the police to convince the defendant to leave his home was not coercive or so ... ...
-
People v. Vale
... ... Amador, 11 A.D.3d 473, 474, 782 N.Y.S.2d 371 ; People v. Robinson, 8 A.D.3d 131, 132, 779 N.Y.S.2d 40 ; People v. Williams, 222 A.D.2d 721, 721, 636 ... ...
- People v. Ackerman