People v. Anderson
Citation | 2008 NY Slip Op 01771,851 N.Y.S.2d 370,48 A.D.3d 825 |
Decision Date | 26 February 2008 |
Docket Number | 2005-09451. |
Parties | THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. TYRONE ANDERSON, Appellant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the court erred in discharging, sua sponte, certain prospective jurors based on their responses to questions regarding whether they or a relative had been arrested or convicted of a crime. The court properly excused those prospective jurors based on its own questioning which revealed, by their own admissions, that they could not be fair and impartial (see People v Wynder, 41 AD3d 209 [2007]; People v McGhee, 4 AD3d 485 [2004]). The defendant's remaining contention regarding jury selection is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]) and, in any event, is without merit (see People v Johnson, 94 NY2d 600 [2000]).
The defendant's constitutional challenge to his adjudication as a persistent felony offender is without merit. Contrary to the defendant's contention, the procedure under which he was sentenced as a persistent felony offender did not violate either his Sixth Amendment or due process rights (see Penal Law § 70.10 [2]; People v Rivera, 5 NY3d 61 [2005], cert denied 546 US 984 [2005]; People v Jordan, 21 AD3d 1039 [2005]).
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Locenitt
...exercised its discretion in excusing them sua sponte (see People v. Cunningham, 119 A.D.3d at 602, 988 N.Y.S.2d 696 ; People v. Anderson, 48 A.D.3d 825, 826, 851 N.Y.S.2d 370 ; People v. James, 47 A.D.3d 947, 948, 849 N.Y.S.2d 670 ).The defendant's contention that the People failed to adduc......
-
People v. Umana
...261, 748 N.Y.S.2d 379). In any event, this procedure was a proper exercise of the trial court's discretion ( see People v. Anderson, 48 A.D.3d 825, 826, 851 N.Y.S.2d 370;76 A.D.3d 1113People v. Wynder, 41 A.D.3d 209, 839 N.Y.S.2d 14; People v. McGhee, 4 A.D.3d at 486, 772 N.Y.S.2d 344; Peop......
- People v. Anderson
- Matter of Word v. Zambelli